T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 147

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re the Dismissal of Sharp Corporation and Sharp Electronics Corporation filed by T-Mobile USA Inc. (Taylor, Brooke) (Filed on 8/16/2012)

1 Parker C. Folse III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
2 Brooke A. M. Taylor (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
3 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
4 Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 David Orozco, CA Bar No. 220732
E-Mail: [e-mail]
7 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
8 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
9 Facsimile: [phone]

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Alexander Levi (PHV Application Pending)
[e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10 Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.
[additional counsel listed on signature
11 page]
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

17
18

This Document Relates to
Case C 3:11-02591 SI

19

T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,

20
21

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

22

Defendants.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
SHARP CORPORATION AND SHARP
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

23
Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Defendants Sharp Corporation and
24
Sharp Electronics Corporation (collectively, “Sharp”), by and through undersigned counsel,
25
stipulate and agree that T-Mobile hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims being asserted
26
against Sharp in the above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of
27
Civil Procedure. In support of this stipulation of dismissal, the parties state as follows:
28
-12375300v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1

1. T-Mobile and Sharp seek the dismissal of this action with prejudice.

2

2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims T-Mobile may have against any

3 other defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.
4

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed

5 Order of Dismissal.
6

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

7 Dated: August 16, 2012.

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.

8

By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor
Parker C. Folse III (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13

David Orozco, CA Bar No. 220732
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18

25

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Alexander Levi (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

26

Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.

19
20
21
22
23
24

27
28
-22375300v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1 Dated: August 16, 2012.

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP

2

By: /s/ Jacob R. Sorensen

3

John M. Grenfell (CA Bar No. 88500)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jacob R. Sorensen (CA Bar No. 209134)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Fusae Nara (pro hac vice)
Andrew D. Lanphere (CA Bar No. 191479)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9

Counsel for Sharp Corporation and
Sharp Electronics Corporation

10
11
12

[PROPOSED] ORDER

13

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing

14
15

therefore, orders as follows:
1.

All claims asserted by T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. against Sharp Corporation and

16

Sharp Electronics Corporation in the underlying action are hereby dismissed

17

with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2); and,

18

2.

Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated Entered: __________________

_______________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
District Court Judge

22
23

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

24
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty
25
26

of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its

27 signatories.
28 Dated: August 16, 2012

By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor
-3-

2375300v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827