T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 165

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting ( 7542 ) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI For Dismissal of Chi Mei Entities re 164 . (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2013) Modified on 1/24/2013 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

1 Parker C. Folse III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
2 Brooke A. M. Taylor (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
3 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
4 Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 David Orozco, CA Bar No. 220732
E-Mail: [e-mail]
7 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
8 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
9 Facsimile: [phone]

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Alexander Levi (PHV Application Pending)
[e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10 Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.
[additional counsel listed on signature
11 page]
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16

IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

17

This Document Relates to
Case C 3:11-02591 SI

18

T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,

19
20

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

21

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

Defendants.

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
CHI MEI CORPORATION, CHI MEI
INNOLUX CORPORATION, CHI MEI
OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.,
CMO JAPAN CO., LTD., NEXGEN
MEDIATECH, INC., AND NEXGEN
MEDIATECH USA, INC. AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

22
23

Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Defendants Chi Mei Corporation,

24 Chi Mei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd.,
25 Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. (collectively “CMI”), by and
26 through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that T-Mobile hereby dismisses with
27 prejudice all claims being asserted against CMI in the above-captioned action pursuant to
28
-12541488v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1 Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this stipulation of
2 dismissal, the parties state as follows:
3

1. T-Mobile and CMI seek the dismissal of this action with prejudice.

4

2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims T-Mobile may have against any

5 other defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.
6

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed

7 Order of Dismissal.
8

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

9
10 Dated: January 22, 2013.

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.

11

By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor
Parker C. Folse III (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13
14
15
16

David Orozco, CA Bar No. 220732
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

17
18
19
20
21

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Alexander Levi (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-22541488v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2

Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.

3
4

Dated: January 22, 2013.

5

SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
By: /s/ Harrison J. Frahn IV
James G. Kreissman
Harrison J. Frahn IV
Jason M. Bussey
SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

6
7
8
9
10

Counsel for Chi Mei Corporation, Chi Mei Innolux
Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO
Japan Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen
Mediatech USA, Inc.

11
12
13
14

[PROPOSED] ORDER

15

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing

16 therefore, orders as follows:
17

1.

All claims asserted by T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. against Chi Mei Corporation, Chi

18

Mei Innolux Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan

19

Co., Ltd., Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA, Inc. in the

20

underlying action are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP

21

41(a)(2); and,

22

2.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees.

24
25 Dated Entered: __________________
1/22/13

_______________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
District Court Judge

26
27
28
-32541488v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

4
5

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

6 of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its
7 signatories.
8 Dated: January 22, 2013

By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-42541488v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827