T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 184

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 183 , (8260) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI re Dismissal of Sanyo Consumer Electronics filed by T-Mobile USA Inc. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2013) Modified on 7/9/2013 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

Edward A. Friedman (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Alexander Levi (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]

1 Parker C. Folse III (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
2 Brooke A. M. Taylor (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
3 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
4 Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
5
Adam Carlis (Pro Hac Vice)
6 [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
7 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
8 Telephone: [phone]
9 Kathryn P. Hoek, CA Bar No. 219247
[e-mail]
10 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
11 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
12
Counsel for T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

17 IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
18
This Document Relates to
19 Case C 3:11-02591 SI
20

22

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

23

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
SANYO CONSUMER ELECTRONICS
CO. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,

21

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

Defendants.

24

Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Defendant Sanyo Consumer

25
Electronics Co., Ltd., now Business Administrative Department, SANYO Electric Co., Ltd.
26
27

(“Sanyo”), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that T-Mobile hereby

28
-12788230v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1 dismisses with prejudice all claims being asserted against Sanyo in the above-captioned action
2 pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

In support of this

stipulation of dismissal, the parties state as follows:
1. T-Mobile and Sanyo seek the dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted against
Sanyo in this action.
2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims T-Mobile may have against any
other defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.
3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed
Order of Dismissal.

11
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
12

Dated: July 3, 2013.

13

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor
Parker C. Folse III (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18
19

Adam Carlis (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]

20
21
22

Kathryn P. Hoek, CA Bar No. 219247
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]

23
24
25
26

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]

27
28

-22788230v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

7

Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Alexander Levi (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8

Counsel for T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.

1
2
3
4
5
6

9
10 Dated: July 3, 2013.

DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

11

14

By: /s/ Allison A. Davis
Allison A. Davis
E-Mail: [e-mail]
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]

15

Counsel for Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd.

12
13

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-32788230v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3
4
5

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.

Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd., now Business Administrative Department,

6

SANYO Electric Co., Ltd., in the underlying action are hereby dismissed with

7

prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2); and,

8
9
10
11
12

All claims asserted by T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. against Defendant Sanyo

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7/8/13
Dated entered: __________________

_______________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
District Court Judge

13
14
15
16

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

17
18

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

19 of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its
20 signatories.
21 Dated: July 3, 2013

By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-42788230v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827