T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 191

ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting (8444) Stipulation in case 3:07-md-01827-SI Stipulation of Dismissal of Tatung Company and Tatung Company of America, Inc. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2013)

Edward A. Friedman (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Alexander Levi (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]

1 Parker C. Folse III (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
2 Brooke A. M. Taylor (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
3 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
4 Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
5
Adam Carlis (Pro Hac Vice)
6 [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
7 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
8 Telephone: [phone]
9 Kathryn P. Hoek, CA Bar No. 219247
[e-mail]
10 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
11 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
12
Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

17 IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
18
This Document Relates to
19 Case C 3:11-02591 SI
20

22

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

23

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,

21

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

Defendants.

24

Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Defendant HannStar Display

25
Corporation, (“HannStar”), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that T26
27

Mobile hereby dismisses with prejudice all claims being asserted against HannStar in the

28
-12824922v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1 above-captioned action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In
2 support of this stipulation of dismissal, the parties state as follows:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

1. T-Mobile and HannStar seek the dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted
against HannStar in this action.
2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims T-Mobile may have against any
other defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.
3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed
Order of Dismissal.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: August 12, 2013.

13

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor
Parker C. Folse III (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18

Adam Carlis (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]

19
20
21
22

Kathryn P. Hoek, CA Bar No. 219247
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]

23
24
25

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)

26
27
28

-22824922v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Alexander Levi (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.

8
9
Dated: August _12, 2013.

FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP

10
By: /s/ Robert E. Freitas
Robert E. Freitas
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FREITAS TSENG & KAUFMAN LLP
100 Marine Parkway, Suite 200
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]

11
12
13
14

Counsel for HannStar Display Corporation

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-32824922v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3
4
5

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.

Display Corporation in the underlying action are hereby dismissed with

6

prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2); and,

7
8
9

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

All claims asserted by T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. against Defendant HannStar

8/13/13

Dated entered: __________________

_______________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
District Court Judge

12
13
14
15

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

16
17

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

18 of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its
19 signatories.
20 Dated: August 12, 2013

By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-42824922v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827