T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 193

NOTICE by T-Mobile USA Inc Notice of Stipulation of Dismissal regarding Philips Electronics North America Corp filed in MDL Master Case (Dkt 8466) (Taylor, Brooke) (Filed on 8/15/2013)

Edward A. Friedman (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Alexander Levi (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]

1 Parker C. Folse III (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
2 Brooke A. M. Taylor (Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
3 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
4 Seattle, WA 98101-3000
Telephone: [phone]
5
Adam Carlis (Pro Hac Vice)
6 [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
7 1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
8 Telephone: [phone]
9 Kathryn P. Hoek, CA Bar No. 219247
[e-mail]
10 SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
11 Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]
12
Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

17 IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
18
This Document Relates to
19 Case C 3:11-02591 SI
20

22

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

23

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH
AMERICA CORPORATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,

21

Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827

Defendants.

24

Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Defendant Philips North America,

25
(“Philips”), by and through undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree that T-Mobile hereby

26
27

dismisses with prejudice all claims being asserted against Philips in the above-captioned

28
-12824778v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1 action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In support of this
2 stipulation of dismissal, the parties state as follows:
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

1. T-Mobile and Philips seek the dismissal with prejudice of all claims asserted
against Philips in this action.
2. This stipulation does not affect the rights or claims T-Mobile may have against any
other defendant or co-conspirator in this litigation.
3. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court issue the Proposed
Order of Dismissal.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: August 15, 2013.

13

SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor
Parker C. Folse III (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14
15
16
17
18

Adam Carlis (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]

19
20
21
22

Kathryn P. Hoek, CA Bar No. 219247
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: [phone]

23
24
25

Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)

26
27
28

-22824778v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Alexander Levi (pro hac vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Counsel for T-Mobile USA, Inc.

8
9
Dated: August 15, 2013.

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

10
By: /s/ Brendan P. Cullen
Brendan P. Cullen
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP
1870 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto, CA 94303
Telephone: [phone]

11
12
13
14

Counsel for Philips Electronics North America
Corporation

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-32824778v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827

1
[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3
4
5

The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing
therefore, orders as follows:
1.

underlying action are hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP

6

41(a)(2); and,

7
8
9

All claims asserted by T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. against Defendant Philips in the

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated entered: __________________

_______________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
District Court Judge

12
13
14
15

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

16
17

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty

18 of perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its
19 signatories.
20 Dated: August 15, 2013

By: /s/ Brooke A.M. Taylor

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-42824778v1/011730

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Master File No. 3:07-md-1827 SI, MDL No. 1827