T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION of Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, Waiver of Service and [Proposed] Order by T-Mobile USA Inc. (Folse, Parker) (Filed on 6/17/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Michael R. Lazerwitz (Pro Hac Vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Jeremy J. Calsyn (State Bar No. 205062)
Email: [e-mail]
Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)
Email: [e-mail]
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 9000
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd.
and LG Display America, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Parker C. Folse III (Pro Hac Vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.SA., Inc.
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]

16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19

T-MOBILE U.S.A, INC.,

20

CASE NO. 11-cv-2591-SI
LEAD CASE NO. M:07-cv-1827-SI

Plaintiff,
21

v.

22
23
24

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT,
WAIVER OF SERVICE, AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Honorable Susan Y. Illston

25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 1
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI

WHEREAS the undersigned counsel, on behalf of plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T1

Mobile”), filed a complaint in the above-captioned case against AU Optronics Corporation, AU

2

Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics

3

USA, Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., ChiMei Innolux

4

Corporation, Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., Nexgen Mediatech, USA, Inc., Tatung Company of

5

America, Inc., Seiko Epson Corporation, Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson Imaging

6

Devices Corporation, HannStar Display Corporation, Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.,

7

Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Mitsui &

8

Co. (Taiwan), Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,

9

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI America, Inc., Sanyo

10

Consumer Electronics, Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Toshiba

11

America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba

12

Corporation and Toshiba Mobile Display Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Stipulating

13

Defendants”), among other defendants, on April 18, 2011 (“Complaint”);

14
15
16
17

WHEREAS T-Mobile wishes to avoid the burden and expense of serving process on the
Stipulating Defendants;
WHEREAS the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to respond to
the Complaint; and

18

WHEREAS T-Mobile and the Stipulating Defendants believe that proceeding on a

19

unified response date will create efficiency for the Court and the parties by reducing duplicative

20

motion practice;

21

THEREFORE, T-Mobile and the Stipulating Defendants hereby agree:

22

1.

The Stipulating Defendants waive service of the Complaint under Federal Rule

23

of Civil Procedure 4(d).

24

Defendants of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the

25

defense of lack of personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

26

____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 2
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI

27
28

This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Stipulating

2.

The Stipulating Defendants’ deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise

1

respond to the Complaint will be 90 days from the execution of this stipulation, subject to

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1).

3
4

DATED this 17th day of June, 2011.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

By: /s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz (with permission)___
Michael R. Lazerwitz (Pro hac vice)
Jeremy J. Caslyn (State Bar No. 205062)
Lee F. Berger (State Bar No. 222756)
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20006
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

12
13

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG
Display America, Inc.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20

By: /s/ Christopher A. Nedeau (with permission)__
Christopher A. Nedeau (State Bar No. 81297)
Carl L. Blumenstein (State Bar No. 124158)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4799
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

21
22

Counsel for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation
and AU Optronics Corporation America

23
24
25
26
27
28

By: /s/ Christopher B. Hocket (with permission)___
Christopher B. Hockett (Bar No. 121539)
Neal A. Potischman (Bar No. 254862)
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 3
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI

1
2

Sandra West (Bar No. 250389)
Samantha H. Knox (Bar No. 254427)
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

3
4
5
6

Counsel for Defendants Chi Mei Optoelectronics
Corporation, Chi Mei Optoelectronics USA, Inc.,
CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Chimei Innolux Corporation,
Nexgen Mediatech, Inc., and Nexgen Mediatech USA,
Inc.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

By: /s/ Stephen P. Freccero (with permission)____
Stephen P. Freccero (State Bar No. 131093)
Melvin R. Goldman (State Bar No. 34097)
Derek F. Foran (State Bar No. 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Counsel for Defendants Seiko Epson Corporation,
Epson Imaging Devices Corporation and Epson
Electronics America, Inc.

By: /s/ Hugh F. Bangasser (with permission)_____
Hugh F. Bangasser (Pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (Pro hac vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98004-1158
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Jeffrey L. Bornstein (State Bar No. 99358)
K&L GATES LLP
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 4
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI

2

4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111-5994
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

3

Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation

1

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

By: /s/ Kent M. Roger (with permission)________
Kent M. Roger (State Bar No. 95987)
Michelle Kim-Szrom (State Bar No. 252901)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Counsel for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi
Displays, Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA),
Inc.

By: /s/ Robert D. Wick (with permission)________
Robert D. Wick (Pro hac vice)
Derek Ludwin (Pro hac vice)
Neil K. Roman (Pro hac vice)
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., and Samsung
Electronics America, Inc.

24
25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 5
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

By: /s/ Gary L. Halling (with permission)________
Gary L. Halling (State Bar No. 66087)
James L. McGinnis (State Bar No. 95788)
Michael W. Scarborough (State Bar No. 203524)
SHEPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. and
Samsung SDI America, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

By: /s/ Allison Ann Davis (with permission)________
Allison Ann Davis
Sam N. Dawood
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Nick Steven Verwolf
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
777 108th Avenue NE, Suite 2300
Bellevue, WA 98004
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

19
20

Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics,
Ltd.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By: /s/ John M. Grenfell (with permission)________
John M. Grenfell (State Bar No. 88500)
Jacob R. Sorensen (State Bar No. 209134)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 6
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI

1
2

[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp
Electronics Corporation

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

By: /s/ Patrick J. Ahern (with permission)________
Patrick J. Ahern (Pro hac vice)
BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP
130 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Tatung Co. of America, Inc.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

By: /s/ John H. Chung (with permission)________
John H. Chung (Pro hac vice)
Christopher M. Curran (Pro hac vice)
Kristen J. McAhren (Pro hac vice)
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Mobile
Display Technology Co., Ltd., and Toshiba America
Information Systems, Inc.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By: _Parker C. Folse, III_____________________
Parker C. Folse III (Pro Hac Vice)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Brooke A. M. Taylor (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 7
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI

Seattle, WA 98101
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

1

David Orozco, CA Bar No. 220732
E-Mail: [e-mail]
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

2
3
4
5
6

Edward A. Friedman (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Daniel B. Rapport (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Hallie B. Levin (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Jason C. Rubinstein
E-Mail: [e-mail]
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER & ADELMAN
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Counsel for Plaintiff T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.

15
16

ATTESTATION: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other

17
signatories thereto has been obtained.
18
19

SO ORDERED this ____ day of _________, 2011.

20
21
By:
22

_______________________________
Honorable Susan Y. Illston

23
24
25
26
27
28

____________________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE - 8
Case No. 11-cv-2591-SI