T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al

Filing 33

ORDER re: extension to time to respond to complaint in 11-3856 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice)
Anne M. Nardacci (admitted pro hac vice)
Christopher V. Fenlon (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff
SCHULTZE AGENCY SERVICES, LLC

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14
15
16

In re: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.)
Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI (N.D. Cal.)
MDL No. 1827

17
18
19
20

This Document Relates To Individual Case No. STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF
3:11-cv-03856-SI (N.D. Cal.)
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT,
WAIVER OF SERVICE AND
SCHULTZE AGENCY SERVICES, LLC on
[PROPOSED] ORDER
behalf of TWEETER OPCO, LLC AND
TWEETER NEWCO, LLC

21
Plaintiff,
22
vs.
23
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-1-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2

WHEREAS, plaintiff Schultze Agency Services, LLC (“Schultze Agency Services”) on

3

behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC (“Tweeter Opco”) and Tweeter Newco, LLC (“Tweeter Newco”)

4

(collectively “Tweeter”) filed a complaint in the above-captioned case against AU Optronics

5

Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Chi Mei

6

Optoelectronics USA, Inc., CMO Japan Co., Ltd., Epson Electronics America, Inc., Epson

7

Imaging Devices Corporation, HannStar Display Corporation, Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA),

8

Inc., Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Display America, Inc., Mitsui

9

& Co. (Taiwan), Ltd., Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc., NEC Corporation of America, NEC Display

10

Solutions of America, Inc., NEC Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,

11

Samsung Electronics Co., Inc., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co.,

12

Ltd., Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation, Tatung Company of America, Inc.,

13

Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.,

14

Toshiba Corporation, and Toshiba Mobile Display Co., Ltd. (collectively, “Stipulating

15

Defendants”) on July 1, 2011 (“Complaint”);

16
17
18
19
20
21
22

WHEREAS, Tweeter wishes to avoid the burden and expense of serving process on the
Stipulating Defendants;
WHEREAS, the Stipulating Defendants desire a reasonable amount of time to respond to
the Complaint; and
WHEREAS, Tweeter and the Stipulating Defendants believe that proceeding on a unified
response date will create efficiency for the Court and the parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

23

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Tweeter, on the one hand, and the

24

Stipulating Defendants, on the other hand, as follows:

25

1.

The Stipulating Defendants waive service of the Complaint under Federal Rule of

26

Civil Procedure 4(d). This stipulation does not constitute a waiver by the Stipulating Defendants

27

of any other substantive or procedural defense, including but not limited to the defenses of lack of

28

personal or subject matter jurisdiction and improper venue.

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.

-2-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2

2.

The Stipulating Defendants’ deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise

3

respond to the Complaint will be ninety (90) days from the execution of this stipulation, subject to

4

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a)(1).

5
6

DATED: July 22, 2011

7
8
9

/s/ William A. Isaacson
William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
5301 Wisconsin Ave. NW, Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

10
Philip J. Iovieno (admitted pro hac vice)
Anne M. Nardacci (admitted pro hac vice)
Christopher V. Fenlon (admitted pro hac vice)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15
16

Counsel for Plaintiff
Schultze Agency Services, LLC

17
18

_____/s/ Christopher A. Nedeau____________
Christopher A. Nedeau (CA Bar No. 81297)
Carl L. Blumenstein (CA Bar No. 124158)
Katharine Chao (CA Bar No. 247571)
NOSSAMAN LLP
50 California Street, 34th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4799
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23
24

Counsel for Defendants AU Optronics Corporation and
AU Optronics Corporation America

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-3-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
_____/s/ Neal A. Potischman____________
Christopher B. Hockett (SBN 121539)
Neal A. Potischman (SBN 254862)
Sandra West (SBN 250389)
Samantha H. Knox (SBN 254427)
Micah G. Block (SBN 270712)
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
1600 El Camino Real
Menlo Park, California 94025
[phone] / [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Jonathan D. Martin (admitted pro hac vice)
Bradley R. Hansen (admitted pro hac vice)
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10017
[phone] / [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16

Counsel for Defendants Chimei Innolux Corporation (f/k/a
Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corp.), Chi Mei Optoelectronics
USA, Inc., and CMO Japan Co., Ltd.

17
18

_____/s/ Stephen P. Freccero______________
Melvin R. Goldman (CA Bar No. 34097)
Stephen P. Freccero (CA Bar No. 131093)
Derek F. Foran (CA Bar No. 224569)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94105-2482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Counsel for Defendants Epson Electronics America, Inc.
and Epson Imaging Devices Corporation

26
27
28

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-4-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2

_____/s/ Ramona M. Emerson_____________
Hugh F. Bangasser (admitted pro hac vice)
Ramona M. Emerson (admitted pro hac vice)
Christopher M. Wyant (admitted pro hac vice)
K&L GATES LLP
925 Fourth Avenue, Suite 2900
Seattle, WA 98104
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Defendant HannStar Display Corporation

9
10

_____/s/ Kent M. Roger__________________
Kent M. Roger (CA Bar No. 95987)
Herman J. Hoying (CA Bar No. 257495)
MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15

Counsel for Defendants Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays,
Ltd. and Hitachi Electronic Devices (USA), Inc.

16
17

_____/s/ Michael R. Lazerwitz_____________
Michael R. Lazerwitz, Esq. (admitted pro hac vice)
Lee F. Berger, Esq. (CA Bar No. 222756)
CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN &
HAMILTON LLP
2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

18
19
20
21
22
23

Counsel for Defendants LG Display Co. Ltd.
and LG Display America, Inc.

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-5-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2

_____/s/ Michael E. Mumford_____________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Counsel for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. and
Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.

10
11

/s/ George D. Niespolo__________
George D. Niespolo (CA Bar No. 72107)
Stephen H. Sutro (CA Bar No. 172168)
DUANE MORRIS LLP
1 Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2200
San Francisco, CA 94105-1104
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12
13
14
15
16

Counsel for Defendants NEC Corporation of America,
NEC Display Solutions of America, Inc., and NEC
Electronics America, Inc.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-6-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
_____/s/ Neil K. Roman_____________
Neil K. Roman
Daniel M. Sulieman
Derek Ludwin
Robert D. Wick
COVINGTON & BURLING
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20004-2401
212-662-5695
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Simon J. Frankel
Jeffrey Michael Davidson
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-591-6000
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

10
11
12
13
14

Counsel for Defendants Samsung
Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics
Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

15
16
17

_____/s/ Allison A. Davis________________
Allison A. Davis (CA Bar No. 139203)
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, CA 94111-6533
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

18
19
20
21

Counsel for Defendant Sanyo Consumer Electronics Co.,
Ltd.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-7-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2

_____/s/ Jacob R. Sorensen_______________
John M. Grenfell (CA Bar No. 88500)
Jacob R. Sorensen (CA Bar No. 209134)
Fusae Nara (pro hac vice)
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8

Counsel for Defendants Sharp Corporation and Sharp
Electronics Corporation

9
10

_____/s/ Rachel S. Brass_________________
Rachel S. Brass
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
555 Mission Street, Suite 3000
San Francisco, CA 94105-2933
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

11
12
13
14
15

Counsel for Defendant Tatung Company of America, Inc.

16
_____/s/ John H. Chung__________________
John H. Chung
WHITE & CASE LLP
1155 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036-2787
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20
21

Counsel for Defendants Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba
America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba America
Information Systems, Inc., and Toshiba Mobile Display
Co., Ltd.

22
23
24

Pursuant to General Order 45, Part X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of
25
this document has been obtained from stipulating defendants.
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-8-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

8/19/11
Dated: ________________, 2011

6
_________________________________
Susan Illston, United States District Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, WAIVER OF SERVICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-9-

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI