T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v AU Optronics Corporation, et al
Filing
56
ORDER granting 54 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Edward A. Friedman (pro hac vice)
Daniel B. Rapport (pro hac vice)
Hallie B. Levin (pro hac vice)
FRIEDMAN KAPLAN SEILER &
ADELMAN LLP
7 Times Square
New York, NY 10036-6516
Telephone: (212) 833-1100
Facsimile: (212) 833-1250
E-Mail: efriedman@fklaw.com
drapport@fklaw.com
hlevin@fklaw.com
David Orozco (CA Bar No. 220732)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1901 Avenue of the Stars, Ste. 950
Los Angeles, CA 90067-6029
Telephone: (310) 310-3100
Facsimile: (310) 789-3150
E-Mail: dorozco@susmangodfrey.com
Parker C. Folse (pro hac vice)
Brooke A. M. Taylor (pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Ave, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 516-3880
Facsimile: (206) 516-3883
E-Mail: pfolse@susmangodfrey.com
btaylor@susmangodfrey.com
Counsel for T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
16
17
IN RE TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI
Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
This Document Relates to
Case C 3:11-02591 SI
MDL NO. 1827
18
19
20
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
T-MOBILE U.S.A, INC.’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
T-MOBILE U.S.A., INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
22
23
24
25
26
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION; AU
OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA,
INC.; CHI MEI CORPORATION; CHIMEI
INNOLUX CORPORATION; CHI MEI
OPTOELECTRONICS USA, INC.; CMO
JAPAN CO. LTD.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH,
INC.; NEXGEN MEDIATECH USA, INC.;
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI; Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
1993149v1/011730
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
CHUNGHWA PICTURE TUBES LTD.;
TATUNG COMPANY; TATUNG COMPANY
OF AMERICA, INC.; SEIKO EPSON
CORPORATION; EPSON IMAGING
DEVICES CORPORATION; EPSON
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.;
HANNSTAR DISPLAY CORPORATION;
HITACHI, LTD.; HITACHI DISPLAYS,
LTD.; HITACHI ELECTRONIC DISPLAYS
(USA), INC.; LG DISPLAY CO. LTD.; LG
DISPLAY AMERICA, INC.; PHILIPS
ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA
CORPORATION; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG
SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.;
SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD.; SAMSUNG SDI
AMERICA, INC.; SANYO CONSUMER
ELECTRONICS, LTD.; SHARP
CORPORATION; SHARP ELECTRONICS
CORPORATION; TOSHIBA
CORPORATION; TOSHIBA AMERICA
ELECTRONICS COMPONENTS, INC.;
TOSHIBA MOBILE DISPLAY
TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.; TOSHIBA
AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendants.
17
18
19
Having
considered
the
application
regarding
whether
certain
documents
plaintiff
T-Mobile U.S.A., Inc. (“T-Mobile”) lodged with the Court should be filed under seal pursuant to Civil
20
21
22
23
24
Local Rules 79-5(d) and 7-10 and the Court’s Standing Order, and good cause appearing, the
application is hereby GRANTED.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that T-Mobile’s Amended Complaint has been redacted and
publicly filed. An unredacted copy of the Amended Complaint shall remain under seal.
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI; Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
1993149v1/011730
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to maintain the effect of the seal under Civil Local Rule 79-
2
5, the parties, their counsel, and their declarants shall not publicly disseminate or discuss any of the
3
4
5
sealed documents or their contents absent further order of the Court.
SO ORDERED:
6
7
11/7/11
________________, 2011
San Francisco, California
DATED:
8
9
________________________________
SUSAN Y. ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Master File No. C M:07-01827 SI / Individual Case No. C 3:11-02591 SI
1993149v1/011730
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?