Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 40

ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 2, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff(s), v. CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02607 MMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS INTEL CORP. ET AL. Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) X Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private Process: 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: X the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated: October 27, 2011 /DF/ DAVID FINK Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: October 27, 2011 /BG/ BARRY GRAHAM Attorney for Defendant ELPIDA MEMORY, INC. Dated: October 27, 2011 /S/ BRIAN A. DIEZEL Attorney for Defendant Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc. Dated: October 27, 2011 /S/ JAMES VALENTINE Attorney for Defendant Intel Corp. CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation.” Also, please be sure to complete the [Proposed] Order by checking the process to which the parties have stipulated, and indicating your requested deadline for the ADR session. [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: 9 Non-binding Arbitration 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) X Mediation 9 Private ADR Deadline for ADR session X 90 days from the date of this order. 9 other ___________________ IT IS SO ORDERED. November 2, 2011 Dated:________________ ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?