Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filing
40
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 2, 2011. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES B. GOODMAN,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02607 MMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
INTEL CORP. ET AL.
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
X
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
X
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated: October 27, 2011
/DF/ DAVID FINK
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: October 27, 2011
/BG/ BARRY GRAHAM
Attorney for Defendant
ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.
Dated: October 27, 2011
/S/ BRIAN A. DIEZEL
Attorney for Defendant
Integrated Silicon Solutions, Inc.
Dated: October 27, 2011
/S/ JAMES VALENTINE
Attorney for Defendant
Intel Corp.
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate ADR Docket Event,
e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation.” Also, please be
sure to complete the [Proposed] Order by checking the process to which the parties have
stipulated, and indicating your requested deadline for the ADR session.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:
9
Non-binding Arbitration
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
X
Mediation
9
Private ADR
Deadline for ADR session
X
90 days from the date of this order.
9
other ___________________
IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 2, 2011
Dated:________________
___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?