Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 54

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ISSI TO SERVE P.R. 3-3 INVALIDITY CONTETIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 6, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 Natalie J. Morgan (SBN 211143) nmorgan@wsgr.com 2 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 12235 El Camino Real, Suite 200 3 San Diego, CA 92130 4 Tel: (858) 350-2300; Fax: (858) 350-2399 5 Nicole W. Stafford (pro hac vice) nstafford@wsgr.com 6 Brian A. Dietzel (pro hac vice) bdietzel@wsgr.com 7 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 8 900 South Capital of Texas Highway Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor 9 Tel: (512) 338-5400; Fax: (512) 338-5490 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff, vs. INTEL CORPORATION, ELPIDA MEMORY, INC., EMERGING MEMORY AND LOGIC SOLUTIONS INC., FIDELIX CO., LTD., INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC., and EON SILICON SOLUTIONS INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 11-CV-2607-MMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ISSI TO SERVE P.R. 3-3 INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 22 23 Pursuant to Civil L. R. 6-1(a), Defendant Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. (ISSI) and James 24 B. Goodman (“Goodman”) have stipulated to extend the time within which to serve its P.R. 3-3 25 Invalidity Contentions until March 8, 2012. 26 Defendant ISSI has requested, and Plaintiff Goodman has agreed to a one-week extension, 27 i.e., up to an including March 8, 2012, of Defendant ISSI’s time to serve its P.R. 3-3 Invalidity 28 1 Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC 1 Contentions. No other dates are hereby requested to be changed. 2 This is the first extension requested for this deadline. The extension does not seek modification 3 of any other dates and is not anticipated to materially impact the case schedule. This stipulation is 4 made in good faith and without any intent to cause delay or prejudice. The parties to this 5 proceeding therefore request that the Honorable Court reset the above-mentioned deadline for good 6 cause shown herein. 7 8 Respectfully submitted, 9 Dated: March 6, 2012 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 10 11 By: /s/ Brian A. Dietzel Brian A. Dietzel 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC. 14 15 FINK & JOHNSON 16 17 By: /s/ David Fink David Fink 18 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMES B. GOODMAN 20 21 22 23 24 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X I, Brian A. Dietzel, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have 25 been obtained from each of the signatories. 26 27 Dated: March 6, 2012 28 By: /s/ Brian A. Dietzel Brian A. Dietzel 2 Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: March 6, 2012 3 ________________________________ 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?