Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al
Filing
54
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANT ISSI TO SERVE P.R. 3-3 INVALIDITY CONTETIONS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 6, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2012)
1 Natalie J. Morgan (SBN 211143)
nmorgan@wsgr.com
2 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
12235 El Camino Real, Suite 200
3
San Diego, CA 92130
4 Tel: (858) 350-2300; Fax: (858) 350-2399
5 Nicole W. Stafford (pro hac vice)
nstafford@wsgr.com
6 Brian A. Dietzel (pro hac vice)
bdietzel@wsgr.com
7
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
8 900 South Capital of Texas Highway
Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor
9 Tel: (512) 338-5400; Fax: (512) 338-5490
10 Attorneys for Defendant
11 INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
JAMES B. GOODMAN,
Plaintiff,
vs.
INTEL CORPORATION,
ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.,
EMERGING MEMORY AND LOGIC
SOLUTIONS INC.,
FIDELIX CO., LTD.,
INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC.,
and
EON SILICON SOLUTIONS INC.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 11-CV-2607-MMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME FOR DEFENDANT ISSI TO
SERVE P.R. 3-3 INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
22
23
Pursuant to Civil L. R. 6-1(a), Defendant Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. (ISSI) and James
24 B. Goodman (“Goodman”) have stipulated to extend the time within which to serve its P.R. 3-3
25 Invalidity Contentions until March 8, 2012.
26
Defendant ISSI has requested, and Plaintiff Goodman has agreed to a one-week extension,
27 i.e., up to an including March 8, 2012, of Defendant ISSI’s time to serve its P.R. 3-3 Invalidity
28
1
Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time
Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC
1 Contentions. No other dates are hereby requested to be changed.
2
This is the first extension requested for this deadline. The extension does not seek modification
3 of any other dates and is not anticipated to materially impact the case schedule. This stipulation is
4 made in good faith and without any intent to cause delay or prejudice. The parties to this
5 proceeding therefore request that the Honorable Court reset the above-mentioned deadline for good
6 cause shown herein.
7
8
Respectfully submitted,
9 Dated: March 6, 2012
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
10
11
By: /s/ Brian A. Dietzel
Brian A. Dietzel
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC.
14
15
FINK & JOHNSON
16
17
By: /s/ David Fink
David Fink
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAMES B. GOODMAN
20
21
22
23
24
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X
I, Brian A. Dietzel, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have
25 been obtained from each of the signatories.
26
27 Dated: March 6, 2012
28
By: /s/ Brian A. Dietzel
Brian A. Dietzel
2
Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time
Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC
1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2 Dated: March 6, 2012
3
________________________________
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time
Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?