Goodman v. Intel Corporation et al

Filing 58

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO PATEN L.R. 4-2. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 26, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 Natalie J. Morgan (SBN 211143) nmorgan@wsgr.com 2 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 12235 El Camino Real, Suite 200 3 San Diego, CA 92130 4 Tel: (858) 350-2300; Fax: (858) 350-2399 5 Nicole W. Stafford (pro hac vice) nstafford@wsgr.com 6 Brian A. Dietzel (pro hac vice) bdietzel@wsgr.com 7 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 8 900 South Capital of Texas Highway Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor 9 Tel: (512) 338-5400; Fax: (512) 338-5490 10 Attorneys for Defendant 11 INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 JAMES B. GOODMAN, Plaintiff, vs. INTEL CORPORATION, ELPIDA MEMORY, INC., EMERGING MEMORY AND LOGIC SOLUTIONS INC., FIDELIX CO., LTD., INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC., and EON SILICON SOLUTIONS INC., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 11-CV-2607-MMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO PATENT L.R. 4-2 JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 22 23 24 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), Defendant Integrated Silicon Solution, Inc. (ISSI) and 25 Plaintiff James B. Goodman (“Goodman”) have agreed and stipulated to a ten-day extension of 26 time, i.e., up to and including April 16, 2012, to exchange preliminary claim constructions and 27 extrinsic evidence pursuant to Patent L.R. 4-2. No other dates are hereby requested to be changed. 28 1 Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC 1 This is the first extension requested for this deadline. The extension does not seek 2 modification of any other dates and is not anticipated to materially impact the case schedule. This 3 stipulation is made in good faith and without any intent to cause delay or prejudice. The parties to 4 this proceeding therefore request that the Honorable Court reset the above-mentioned deadline for 5 good cause shown herein. 6 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 Dated: March 24, 2012 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 9 10 By: /s/ Brian A. Dietzel Brian A. Dietzel 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant INTEGRATED SILICON SOLUTION, INC. 13 14 FINK & JOHNSON 15 16 By: /s/ David Fink David Fink 17 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff JAMES B. GOODMAN 19 20 21 22 23 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45.X I, Brian A. Dietzel, hereby attest that concurrences in the filing of this document have been obtained from each of the signatories. 24 25 26 Dated: March 24, 2012 By: /s/ Brian A. Dietzel Brian A. Dietzel 27 28 2 Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: March 26, 2012 3 ________________________________ 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MAXINE M. CHESNEY 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Joint Stipulation and [PROPOSED] Order Extending Time Case No. 11-CV-2607-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?