Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd v. AU Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 14 Stipulation, filed by AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/15/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

RON E. SHULMAN (Bar No. 178263)
[e-mail]
BOB STEINBERG (Bar No. 126407)
[e-mail]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-463-2600
LAWRENCE J. GOTTS (pro hac vice pending)
[e-mail]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
555 Eleventh Street NW, Suite 1000
Washington, DC 20004-1304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-637-2201
JULIE M. HOLLOWAY (Bar No. 196942)
[e-mail]
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-395-8095
Attorneys for
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
SAN JOSE DIVISION

19
20

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,

21
22
23
24

Plaintiff,
v.
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al.,

Case No. C-11-2620 PSG
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL
L.R. 6-1(A) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
ORDER

Defendants,

25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

Stipulation Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) for Extension of

1 Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint
- C-11-2620 PSG

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation

2

America, Acer America Corporation, Acer Inc., BenQ America Corp., BenQ Corp., SANYO

3

Electric Co., Ltd., and SANYO North America Corporation (collectively “Defendants”) and

4

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff”) stipulate to extend the time within which Defendants

5

are permitted to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint. The stipulated response

6

date is August 15, 2011. This will not alter any deadlines fixed by the Court. In addition,

7

Defendants waive the requirement that they be served with a summons pursuant to Fed. R.

8

Civ. P. 4.

9
10

Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, Bob

11

Steinberg hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from

12

the other signatories listed below.

13
14
15

Dated: July 6, 2011

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
By:

16
17
18

/S/ - Bob Steinberg
Bob Steinberg

Attorneys for Defendants
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA

19

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

20

By:

21
22
23
24

/S/ - James Yoon
James Yoon

Attorneys for Defendants
ACER INC.,
ACER AMERICA CORPORATION,
BENQ CORP., and
BENQ AMERICA CORP.

25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

Stipulation Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) for Extension of

2 Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint
- C-11-2620 PSG

1

KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP

2

By:

/S/ - Michael A. Dorfman
Michael A. Dorfman

3
Attorneys for Defendants
SANYO ELECTRIC CO., LTD. and
SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION

4
5
6

O’MELVENY AND MYERS LLP

7

By:

/S/ - Brian Berliner
Brian Berliner

8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

9
10

S
UNIT
ED

15

ER

H

18

FO

RT

17

hen
rd M. C
ge Edwa
Jud

NO

16

R NIA

_______________
ERED
Edward M. Chen
O ORD
S
U.S. District Judge IT IS

LI

14

RT
U
O

12
13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

IT IS SO ORDERED:

A

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
LOS ANGELES

Stipulation Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a) for Extension of

3 Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint
- C-11-2620 PSG

PROOF OF SERVICE
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years
and not a party to this action. My business address is Latham & Watkins LLP, 355 South Grand Avenue, Los
Angeles, CA 90071-1560.
On July 6, 2011, I served the following document described as:
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-1(A) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT
by serving a true copy of the above-described document in the following manner:
BY U.S. MAIL
I am familiar with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting and processing
documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service. Under that practice, documents are deposited with
the Latham & Watkins LLP personnel responsible for depositing documents with the United States Postal
Service; such documents are delivered to the United States Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course
of business, with postage thereon fully prepaid. I deposited in Latham & Watkins LLP’ interoffice mail a sealed
envelope or package containing the above-described document and addressed as set forth below in accordance
with the office practice of Latham & Watkins LLP for collecting and processing documents for mailing with the
United States Postal Service:
James C. Yoon
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304

Michael A. Dorfman
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
525 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60661-3693

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of, or permitted to practice
before, this Court at whose direction the service was made and declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on July 6, 2011, at Los Angeles, California.

/s/ Andy Magno
Andy Magno

LA\2277134.1