Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
Filing
83
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO AMEND re (82 in 3:11-cv-02620-EMC) Stipulation, filed by Benq Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Sanyo Manufacturing Corporation, AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, Acer America Corporation, BenQ America Corp. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/10/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
GEORGE RILEY (CA Bar No. 118304)
griley@omm.com
DARIN SNYDER (CA Bar No. 136003)
dsnyder@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Telephone: (415) 984-8700
Facsimile: (415) 984-8701
MARK SAMUELS (CA Bar No. 107026)
msamuels@omm.com
BRIAN M. BERLINER (CA Bar No. 156732)
bberliner@omm.com
RYAN YAGURA (CA Bar No. 197619
ryagura@omm.com
MARCUS S. QUINTANILLA (CA Bar No. 202994)
mquintanilla@omm.com
VISION L. WINTER (CA Bar No. 234172)
vwinter@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899
Telephone: (213) 430-6000
Facsimile: (213) 430-6407
Attorneys for
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and Related Parties
17
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., )
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.
)
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC
STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL
L.R. 6-1(B) FOR EXTENSION AND/OR
CREATION OF DEADLINE TO AMEND
PLEADINGS ; ORDER
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF
DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
1
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation
2
America (collectively, “AUO”); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America,
3
Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”); Acer Inc., Acer America Corp., BenQ Corp., BenQ America
4
Corp., SANYO Electronic Co., Inc., SANYO Manufacturing Corp. (collectively, “AUO
5
Customer Counterclaim Defendants”); AT&T Mobility LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P.,
6
BestBuy.com, LLC, Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, and Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a
7
BrandsMart U.S.A. (collectively, “Samsung Customer Defendants”) stipulate to extend and/or
8
create the deadline by which the aforementioned parties are permitted to amend pleadings in this
9
consolidated action.
10
WHEREAS, the Court’s Case Management and Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. #68) set
11
November 30, 2011, as the deadline for the last day to add parties, but did not explicitly set a
12
deadline to amend pleadings;
13
WHEREAS, the parties stipulated and the Court approved (Dkt. #62 in Case No. 3:11-cv-
14
03170-EMC and Dkt. #74 in Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC) to extend until December 1, 2011,
15
the deadline by which Samsung, Samsung Customer Defendants, AUO, and AUO Customer
16
Counterclaim Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the operative claims and
17
counterclaims filed in this action;
18
WHEREAS, the parties prefer, consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1),
19
that the deadline to amend pleadings be set after the current (December 1, 2011) deadline to
20
respond to the operative claims and counterclaims.
21
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE
22
PARTIES HERETO, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL AND SUBJECT TO THE
23
APPROVAL OF THE COURT, AS FOLLOWS:
24
The deadline by which the parties are permitted to amend pleadings without leave of
25
Court is set for December 22, 2011, which is three weeks following the current deadline for
26
responding to the operative claims and counterclaims.
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC
-2-
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF
DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
1
Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures,
2
Marcus S. Quintanilla hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
3
obtained from the other signatory listed below.
4
November 9, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
5
6
7
By /s/ Marcus S. Quintanilla
Brian M. Berliner
Marcus S. Quintanilla
Vision Winter
400 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899
Telephone: (213) 430-6000
Facsimile: (213) 430-6407
8
9
10
11
Counsel for
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
AT&T Mobility LLC
Best Buy Stores, L.P.,
BestBuy.com, LLC
Best Buy Purchasing, LLC
Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a
BrandsMart U.S.A.
12
13
14
15
16
17
November 9, 2011
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
18
19
By
20
21
22
23
24
/s/ Bob Steinberg
Bob Steinberg
Lawrence J. Gotts
Bert C. Reiser
555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 100
Washington, DC 20004-1304
Telephone: (202) 637-2200
Facsimile: (202) 637-2201
Counsel for
AU Optronics Corporation and
AU Optronics Corporation America
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC
-3-
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF
DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
1
November 9, 2011
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
2
3
By
4
/s/ James C. Yoon
James C. Yoon
S. Michael Song
Albert Shih
Kirin K. Gill
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
5
6
7
8
Counsel for Respondents
Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation,
BenQ Corp., and BenQ America Corp.
9
10
11
12
November 9, 2011
KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
13
14
By
/s/ Michael Dorfman
Michael A. Dorfman
525 West Monroe Street
Chicago, IL 60661-3693
Telephone: (312) 902-5200
Facsimile: (312) 902-1061
15
16
17
Counsel for Respondents
Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. and
Sanyo Manufacturing Corporation
18
19
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
_______________________________________
Honorable Edward M. Chen RDERED
United States DistrictIS SO O
IT Judge
25
dwa
Judge E
28
Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC
-4-
A
H
ER
LI
RT
27
hen
rd M. C
NO
26
R NIA
24
S
11/10/11
Dated:______________
UNIT
ED
23
RT
U
O
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
21
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF
DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?