Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd v. AU Optronics Corp. et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO AMEND re (82 in 3:11-cv-02620-EMC) Stipulation, filed by Benq Corporation, Sanyo North America Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Sanyo Manufacturing Corporation, AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corporation America, Acer America Corporation, BenQ America Corp. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/10/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 GEORGE RILEY (CA Bar No. 118304) griley@omm.com DARIN SNYDER (CA Bar No. 136003) dsnyder@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 MARK SAMUELS (CA Bar No. 107026) msamuels@omm.com BRIAN M. BERLINER (CA Bar No. 156732) bberliner@omm.com RYAN YAGURA (CA Bar No. 197619 ryagura@omm.com MARCUS S. QUINTANILLA (CA Bar No. 202994) mquintanilla@omm.com VISION L. WINTER (CA Bar No. 234172) vwinter@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and Related Parties 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) AU OPTRONICS CORP., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. ) Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC STIPULATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 6-1(B) FOR EXTENSION AND/OR CREATION OF DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS ; ORDER 27 28 Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation 2 America (collectively, “AUO”); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, 3 Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”); Acer Inc., Acer America Corp., BenQ Corp., BenQ America 4 Corp., SANYO Electronic Co., Inc., SANYO Manufacturing Corp. (collectively, “AUO 5 Customer Counterclaim Defendants”); AT&T Mobility LLC, Best Buy Stores, L.P., 6 BestBuy.com, LLC, Best Buy Purchasing, LLC, and Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a 7 BrandsMart U.S.A. (collectively, “Samsung Customer Defendants”) stipulate to extend and/or 8 create the deadline by which the aforementioned parties are permitted to amend pleadings in this 9 consolidated action. 10 WHEREAS, the Court’s Case Management and Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. #68) set 11 November 30, 2011, as the deadline for the last day to add parties, but did not explicitly set a 12 deadline to amend pleadings; 13 WHEREAS, the parties stipulated and the Court approved (Dkt. #62 in Case No. 3:11-cv- 14 03170-EMC and Dkt. #74 in Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC) to extend until December 1, 2011, 15 the deadline by which Samsung, Samsung Customer Defendants, AUO, and AUO Customer 16 Counterclaim Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the operative claims and 17 counterclaims filed in this action; 18 WHEREAS, the parties prefer, consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), 19 that the deadline to amend pleadings be set after the current (December 1, 2011) deadline to 20 respond to the operative claims and counterclaims. 21 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN THE 22 PARTIES HERETO, THROUGH THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL AND SUBJECT TO THE 23 APPROVAL OF THE COURT, AS FOLLOWS: 24 The deadline by which the parties are permitted to amend pleadings without leave of 25 Court is set for December 22, 2011, which is three weeks following the current deadline for 26 responding to the operative claims and counterclaims. 27 28 Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC -2- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS 1 Filer’s Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B regarding signatures, 2 Marcus S. Quintanilla hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 3 obtained from the other signatory listed below. 4 November 9, 2011 Respectfully submitted, O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP 5 6 7 By /s/ Marcus S. Quintanilla Brian M. Berliner Marcus S. Quintanilla Vision Winter 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071-2899 Telephone: (213) 430-6000 Facsimile: (213) 430-6407 8 9 10 11 Counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. AT&T Mobility LLC Best Buy Stores, L.P., BestBuy.com, LLC Best Buy Purchasing, LLC Interbond Corporation of America d/b/a BrandsMart U.S.A. 12 13 14 15 16 17 November 9, 2011 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 18 19 By 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Bob Steinberg Bob Steinberg Lawrence J. Gotts Bert C. Reiser 555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 100 Washington, DC 20004-1304 Telephone: (202) 637-2200 Facsimile: (202) 637-2201 Counsel for AU Optronics Corporation and AU Optronics Corporation America 25 26 27 28 Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC -3- STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS 1 November 9, 2011 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 2 3 By 4 /s/ James C. Yoon James C. Yoon S. Michael Song Albert Shih Kirin K. Gill 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 5 6 7 8 Counsel for Respondents Acer Inc., Acer America Corporation, BenQ Corp., and BenQ America Corp. 9 10 11 12 November 9, 2011 KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP 13 14 By /s/ Michael Dorfman Michael A. Dorfman 525 West Monroe Street Chicago, IL 60661-3693 Telephone: (312) 902-5200 Facsimile: (312) 902-1061 15 16 17 Counsel for Respondents Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. and Sanyo Manufacturing Corporation 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, _______________________________________ Honorable Edward M. Chen RDERED United States DistrictIS SO O IT Judge 25 dwa Judge E 28 Case No. 3:11-cv-02620-EMC -4- A H ER LI RT 27 hen rd M. C NO 26 R NIA 24 S 11/10/11 Dated:______________ UNIT ED 23 RT U O 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 21 N F D IS T IC T O R C STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION/CREATION OF DEADLINE TO AMEND PLEADINGS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?