Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.

Filing 132

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 128 re THIRD AMENDMENT TO JANUARY 31, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by Barnesandnoble.com LLC, Barnes & Noble Inc., LSI Corporation, Agere Systems, Inc. Claims Construction Hearing reset for 4/29/2013 09:3 0 AM. Tutorial Hearing set for 4/22/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 4/30/2013 09:30 AM. Tutorial Hearing set for 4/23/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 5/1/2013 09:30 AM.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378)
865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13

David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc

CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO.
136411)
[e-mail]
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO.
168633)
[e-mail]
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
[e-mail]
RAVI RANGANATH (CSB NO. 272981)
[e-mail]
YIXIN ZHANG (CSB No. 270527)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and
Agere Systems Inc.

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC,

19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
23

LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS INC.,

Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
THIRD AMENDMENT TO JANUARY
31, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
(Modified)
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.

24
25

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc

26

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc. (“Defendants”)

27

(collectively, the “Parties”), stipulate as recited below and jointly request that the Court amend

28

the current case management schedule as set forth below.
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1
2
3
4

WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated January 31, 2012 [Dkt. No. 84], issued a Case
Management Order setting forth the case schedule through claim construction;
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated March 26, 2012 [Dkt. No. 92], amended that
schedule;

5

WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated July 23, 2012 [Dkt. No. 123] further amended the

6

case schedule, incorporating deadlines for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants’ Interrogatory Nos.

7

9, 13, 15, and 16 and for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Patent Local Rule 3-3 disclosures;

8

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have requested an approximately one-month extension to the case

9

schedule in order to accommodate scheduling difficulties due to Plaintiffs’ counsels’ obligations

10
11

in other matters;
WHEREAS, Defendants do not object to the extension of the case schedule, provided the

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

Court is available on the alternative dates it had previously suggested to the parties for claim

13

construction and the tutorial;

14
15

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that, in view of the foregoing,
the case schedule shall be modified as set forth below:

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES

2

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1
2
3
4

Proposed Date

Event
Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying
Document Production

10/24/12

Plaintiffs to Provide Substantive Responses to
Defendants’ Interrogatory Nos. 9, 13, 15 and 16

10/24/12

Exchange Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for
Construction

11/30/12

9

Defendants to Provide Substantive Responses to
Plaintiffs’ Invalidity Contentions

12/5/12

10

Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and
Supporting References

12/21/12

File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement

1/18/13

ADR Deadline

1/25/13

Completion of Claim Construction Discovery

2/15/13

Serve and File Opening Claim Construction Brief

3/1/13

Serve and File Claim Construction Response Brief

3/15/13

16

Serve and File Claim Construction Reply Brief

3/22/13

17

Serve and File Claim Construction Sur-Reply Brief

3/29/13

18

Tutorial (subject to the Court’s availability)

19

Claim Construction Hearing (subject to the Court’s
availability)

5
6
7
8

11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15

20

4/22/13 & 4/23/13 (4/22 9:30-4:30)
(4/23 9:30-1:30)
4/29/13, 4/30/13, and (4/29 and 4/30 5/1/13
9:30-4:30
4/30 9:30-1:30)

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES

3

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1

Dated: September 5, 2012

FENWICK & WEST LLP

2
By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.

3
4
5
6

Dated: September 5, 2012

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Carl G. Anderson
Carl G. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc

9
10
11

13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED.

16

S

24

dward
Judge E

ER

n
M. Che

H

23

RT

22

NO

21

R NIA

20

DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO

FO

19

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

LI

18

RT
U
O

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

15

UNIT
ED

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES

4

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of

3

perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4
5

Dated: September 5, 2012

FENWICK & WEST LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.

8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES

5

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC