Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.
Filing
132
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 128 re THIRD AMENDMENT TO JANUARY 31, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER filed by Barnesandnoble.com LLC, Barnes & Noble Inc., LSI Corporation, Agere Systems, Inc. Claims Construction Hearing reset for 4/29/2013 09:3 0 AM. Tutorial Hearing set for 4/22/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 4/30/2013 09:30 AM. Tutorial Hearing set for 4/23/2013 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Claims Construction Hearing set for 5/1/2013 09:30 AM.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378)
865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Email: johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875 6600
Facsimile: (415) 875 6700
Email: davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com
melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc
CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO.
136411)
cmorrow@fenwick.com
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO.
168633)
vdemarchi@fenwick.com
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
hribera@fenwick.com
RAVI RANGANATH (CSB NO. 272981)
rranganath@fenwick.com
YIXIN ZHANG (CSB No. 270527)
yzhang@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: (650) 988-8500
Facsimile: (650) 938-5200
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and
Agere Systems Inc.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
23
LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS INC.,
Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
THIRD AMENDMENT TO JANUARY
31, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
(Modified)
Trial Date: None set
Defendants.
24
25
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc
26
(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc. (“Defendants”)
27
(collectively, the “Parties”), stipulate as recited below and jointly request that the Court amend
28
the current case management schedule as set forth below.
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
2
3
4
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated January 31, 2012 [Dkt. No. 84], issued a Case
Management Order setting forth the case schedule through claim construction;
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated March 26, 2012 [Dkt. No. 92], amended that
schedule;
5
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated July 23, 2012 [Dkt. No. 123] further amended the
6
case schedule, incorporating deadlines for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants’ Interrogatory Nos.
7
9, 13, 15, and 16 and for Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ Patent Local Rule 3-3 disclosures;
8
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have requested an approximately one-month extension to the case
9
schedule in order to accommodate scheduling difficulties due to Plaintiffs’ counsels’ obligations
10
11
in other matters;
WHEREAS, Defendants do not object to the extension of the case schedule, provided the
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
Court is available on the alternative dates it had previously suggested to the parties for claim
13
construction and the tutorial;
14
15
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that, in view of the foregoing,
the case schedule shall be modified as set forth below:
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES
2
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
2
3
4
Proposed Date
Event
Disclosure of Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying
Document Production
10/24/12
Plaintiffs to Provide Substantive Responses to
Defendants’ Interrogatory Nos. 9, 13, 15 and 16
10/24/12
Exchange Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for
Construction
11/30/12
9
Defendants to Provide Substantive Responses to
Plaintiffs’ Invalidity Contentions
12/5/12
10
Exchange Preliminary Claim Constructions and
Supporting References
12/21/12
File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement
1/18/13
ADR Deadline
1/25/13
Completion of Claim Construction Discovery
2/15/13
Serve and File Opening Claim Construction Brief
3/1/13
Serve and File Claim Construction Response Brief
3/15/13
16
Serve and File Claim Construction Reply Brief
3/22/13
17
Serve and File Claim Construction Sur-Reply Brief
3/29/13
18
Tutorial (subject to the Court’s availability)
19
Claim Construction Hearing (subject to the Court’s
availability)
5
6
7
8
11
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
20
4/22/13 & 4/23/13 (4/22 9:30-4:30)
(4/23 9:30-1:30)
4/29/13, 4/30/13, and (4/29 and 4/30 5/1/13
9:30-4:30
4/30 9:30-1:30)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES
3
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
Dated: September 5, 2012
FENWICK & WEST LLP
2
By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.
3
4
5
6
Dated: September 5, 2012
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
7
8
By: /s/ Carl G. Anderson
Carl G. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc
9
10
11
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
16
S
24
dward
Judge E
ER
n
M. Che
H
23
RT
22
NO
21
R NIA
20
DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO
FO
19
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
LI
18
RT
U
O
17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
15
UNIT
ED
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES
4
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
2
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
3
perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
4
5
Dated: September 5, 2012
FENWICK & WEST LLP
6
7
By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.
8
9
10
11
MOUNTAIN VIEW
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES
5
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?