Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER re 12 Stipulation filed by LSI Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/24/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO. 136411)
[e-mail]
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633)
[e-mail]
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
[e-mail]
RYAN TYZ (CSB NO. 234895)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9

Attorneys for Defendant
LSI Corporation

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MOUNTAIN VIEW

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
BARNES & NOBLE, INC.,

Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC

15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
LSI CORPORATION,
18

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR DEFENDANT’S
RESPONSIVE PLEADING ; ORDER
Trial Date: None set

Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME

11-CV-02709 EMC

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiff Barnes & Noble, Inc. (“Barnes & Noble”)

2

and Defendant LSI Corporation (“LSI”), by and through their respective counsel of record,

3

hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

4
5
6
7
8
9
10

WHEREAS, Barnes & Noble served its Complaint for Declaratory Judgment of Patent
Non-Infringement (“Complaint”) on June 6, 2011;
WHEREAS, the deadline for LSI to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is June
27, 2011; and
WHEREAS, both parties have agreed that the time for LSI to answer or otherwise respond
to the Complaint should be extended by 30 days.
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that LSI shall have until July 27, 2011 to answer

Dated: June 16, 2011

FENWICK & WEST LLP

13
14

By: /s/ Ryan Tyz
Ryan Tyz
Attorneys for Defendant
LSI Corporation

15
16
17

Dated: June 16, 2011

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER &
HEDGES, LLP

18
19

By: /s/ David Eiseman
David Eiseman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Barnes & Noble, Inc.

20
21

S

RT
U
O

26

RT

ER

H

28

NO

27

ED

_________________ SO ORDER
I IS
Edward M. ChenT
U.S. District Judge
. Chen
dward M
Judge E

LI

25

A

24

R NIA

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
IT IS SO ORDERED:
TA

FO

22

UNIT
ED

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

or otherwise respond to the Complaint.

12
F ENWICK & W EST LLP

11

N
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME
D

F
IS T RIC T O

C

2

11-CV-02709 EMC

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of

3

perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4
5

Dated: June 16, 2011

FENWICK & WEST LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Ryan Tyz
Ryan Tyz
Attorneys for Defendant
LSI Corporation

8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME

3

11-CV-02709 EMC