Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.

Filing 179

AMENDED ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES. Tutorial: 6/21/13 at 10:00 a.m. Claim Construction Hearing: 7/5/13 10:00 a.m. and 7/8/13 at 2:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/15/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378) Shon Morgan (Bar No. 187736) 865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Email: johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com shonmorgan@quinnemanuel.com 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649) Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927) 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875 6600 Facsimile: (415) 875 6700 Email: davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO. 136411) cmorrow@fenwick.com VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633) vdemarchi@fenwick.com HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511) hribera@fenwick.com RAVI RANGANATH (CSB NO. 272981) rranganath@fenwick.com YIXIN ZHANG (CSB No. 270527) yzhang@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 22 23 LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS LLC, Defendants. Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT TO SEPTEMBER 5, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Trial Date: None set AMENDED ORDER 24 25 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc 26 (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC (“Defendants”) 27 (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as recited 28 below and jointly request that the Court amend the current case management schedule as set forth STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC 1 below. 2 3 WHEREAS, the Parties filed a Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (the “JCCS”) on January 18, 2013 [Dkt. No. 163]; 4 WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated September 5, 2012 [Dkt. No. 132], set certain 5 deadlines in the case, including the completion of claim construction discovery by February 15, 6 2013; 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a further case management conference for February28, 2013 [Dkt. No. 147]; WHEREAS, in the JCCS, the Parties stated their respective positions regarding expert 10 witness testimony on claim construction, but did not agree as to whether extrinsic evidence in the 11 form of expert testimony is necessary or appropriate in the present case [Dkt. No. 163 at 6-8]; 12 13 14 WHEREAS, neither Party has served an expert report or declaration including expert witness testimony on claim construction; WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed that, in the event either Party 15 submits a declaration including expert testimony in support of a claim construction brief, that 16 expert will be made available for deposition before the opposing Party’s next claim construction 17 brief is due, at a time and place mutually convenient for the Parties; 18 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, in view of the foregoing, the date set by the Court for 19 the completion of claim construction discovery shall be extended by a period of forty-nine days 20 until April 5, 2013; 21 22 23 24 WHEREAS, the Parties do not expect that this proposed extension will impact any other dates already fixed by Court Order; THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that the deadline for the completion of claim construction discovery, currently set for February 15, 2013, shall be extended to April 5, 2013. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY 2 CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC 1 Dated: February 13, 2013 FENWICK & WEST LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath Ravi Ranganath Attorneys for Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC 4 5 6 Dated: February 13, 2013 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 7 8 By: /s/ Carl G. Anderson Carl G. Anderson Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc 9 10 11 12 13 14 S . Che ward M R NIA DIFIE AS MO n A H LI FO Judge Ed Edward M. Chen ER United StatesC District Judge N F DI TO RT 18 NO 17 RT U O 16 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. All other deadlines are set as follows* ISTRIC ES D TC AT T Further CMC is reset from 2/28/13 to ERED 4/11/13 at 10:30 a.m. O ORD D IT IS S UNIT ED 15 S T RIC 19 20 21 22 23 24 *4/5/13 - Completion of claim construction discovery 4/19/13 - Serve and file opening claim construction brief 5/3/13 - Serve and file claim construction response brief 5/10/13 - Serve and file claim construction reply brief 5/17/13 - Serve and file claim construction sur-reply brief 6/7/13 (9:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.) - Tutorial 6/21/13 10:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m. 6/10 & 6/11/13 (9:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.) - Claim construction hearing 7/5/13 10:00a.m.-4:30 p.m. 7/8/13 2:30p.m.-4:30 p.m. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY 3 CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC 1 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 2 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of 3 perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 4 5 Dated: February 13, 2013 FENWICK & WEST LLP 6 7 By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath Ravi Ranganath Attorneys for Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY 4 CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?