Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.
Filing
179
AMENDED ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DEADLINES. Tutorial: 6/21/13 at 10:00 a.m. Claim Construction Hearing: 7/5/13 10:00 a.m. and 7/8/13 at 2:30 p.m.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/15/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378)
Shon Morgan (Bar No. 187736)
865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Email: johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com
shonmorgan@quinnemanuel.com
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875 6600
Facsimile: (415) 875 6700
Email: davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com
melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com
CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO. 136411)
cmorrow@fenwick.com
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633)
vdemarchi@fenwick.com
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
hribera@fenwick.com
RAVI RANGANATH (CSB NO. 272981)
rranganath@fenwick.com
YIXIN ZHANG (CSB No. 270527)
yzhang@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: (650) 988-8500
Facsimile: (650) 938-5200
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and
Agere Systems LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
23
LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS LLC,
Defendants.
Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
AMENDMENT TO SEPTEMBER 5, 2012
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Trial Date: None set
AMENDED ORDER
24
25
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc
26
(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC (“Defendants”)
27
(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as recited
28
below and jointly request that the Court amend the current case management schedule as set forth
STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
below.
2
3
WHEREAS, the Parties filed a Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (the
“JCCS”) on January 18, 2013 [Dkt. No. 163];
4
WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated September 5, 2012 [Dkt. No. 132], set certain
5
deadlines in the case, including the completion of claim construction discovery by February 15,
6
2013;
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the Court has scheduled a further case management conference for
February28, 2013 [Dkt. No. 147];
WHEREAS, in the JCCS, the Parties stated their respective positions regarding expert
10
witness testimony on claim construction, but did not agree as to whether extrinsic evidence in the
11
form of expert testimony is necessary or appropriate in the present case [Dkt. No. 163 at 6-8];
12
13
14
WHEREAS, neither Party has served an expert report or declaration including expert
witness testimony on claim construction;
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred and agreed that, in the event either Party
15
submits a declaration including expert testimony in support of a claim construction brief, that
16
expert will be made available for deposition before the opposing Party’s next claim construction
17
brief is due, at a time and place mutually convenient for the Parties;
18
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that, in view of the foregoing, the date set by the Court for
19
the completion of claim construction discovery shall be extended by a period of forty-nine days
20
until April 5, 2013;
21
22
23
24
WHEREAS, the Parties do not expect that this proposed extension will impact any other
dates already fixed by Court Order;
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that the deadline for the completion of claim
construction discovery, currently set for February 15, 2013, shall be extended to April 5, 2013.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY
2
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
Dated: February 13, 2013
FENWICK & WEST LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC
4
5
6
Dated: February 13, 2013
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
7
8
By: /s/ Carl G. Anderson
Carl G. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc
9
10
11
12
13
14
S
. Che
ward M
R NIA
DIFIE
AS MO
n
A
H
LI
FO
Judge Ed
Edward M. Chen
ER
United StatesC District Judge
N
F
DI
TO
RT
18
NO
17
RT
U
O
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
All other deadlines are set as follows*
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
Further CMC is reset from 2/28/13 to
ERED
4/11/13 at 10:30 a.m.
O ORD D
IT IS S
UNIT
ED
15
S T RIC
19
20
21
22
23
24
*4/5/13 - Completion of claim construction discovery
4/19/13 - Serve and file opening claim construction brief
5/3/13 - Serve and file claim construction response brief
5/10/13 - Serve and file claim construction reply brief
5/17/13 - Serve and file claim construction sur-reply brief
6/7/13 (9:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.)
- Tutorial 6/21/13 10:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.
6/10 & 6/11/13 (9:30 a.m. - 4:30 p.m.) - Claim construction hearing
7/5/13 10:00a.m.-4:30 p.m.
7/8/13 2:30p.m.-4:30 p.m.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY
3
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
2
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
3
perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
4
5
Dated: February 13, 2013
FENWICK & WEST LLP
6
7
By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION DISCOVERY
4
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?