Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.

Filing 250

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 247 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER [JOINT] re Amendment to March 25, 2013 Case Management Order filed by LSI Corporation. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/3/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378)
865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13

David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO. 136411)
[e-mail]
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633)
[e-mail]
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and
Agere Systems LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC,

19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
23

LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS LLC,

Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
AMENDMENT TO MARCH 25, 2013
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.

24
25

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc

26

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC (“Defendants”)

27

(collectively, the “Parties”), stipulate as recited below and jointly request that the Court amend

28

the current case management schedule as set forth below.
JOINT STIPULATION RE AMENDMENT
TO 3/25/13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1

WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated May 15, 2013 [Dkt. No. 221] amended the case

2

schedule to provide a schedule for Patent Local Rule disclosures regarding the Supplemental

3

Patents1 and for consolidated claim construction briefing, tutorial and hearing with respect to

4

disputed claim terms in both the Asserted Patents2 and Supplemental Patents;

5
6

WHEREAS, the Parties desire additional time consider certain discovery before
exchanging claim terms and proposed constructions;

7

WHEREAS, these revisions will not impact any other dates already fixed by Court order;

8

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that, in view of the foregoing,

9

the case schedule shall be modified as set forth below:

10
11

Current Date
Parties to exchange proposed terms
for construction related to the
Supplemental Patents
Parties to exchange preliminary
claim constructions and extrinsic
evidence related to the
Supplemental Patents
Parties to serve and file joint claim
construction and prehearing
statement related to Asserted and
Supplemental Patents

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17

Proposed New Date

September 27, 2013 October 7, 2013

October 18, 2013

October 24, 2013

November 12, 2013

November 15, 2013

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The Supplemental Patents are: U.S. Patent No. 6,982,663, U.S. Patent No. 5,870,087, U.S.
Patent No. 5,452,006, and U.S. Patent No. 8,041,394.
2
The Asserted Patents are: U.S. Patent No. 5,670,730, U.S. Patent 6,452,958, U.S. Patent No.
6,707,867, U.S. Patent No. 5,546,420, and U.S. Patent No. 5,920,552.
JOINT STIPULATION RE AMENDMENT
TO 3/25/13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

2

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1

Dated: September 27, 2013

FENWICK & WEST LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Bryan A. Kohm
Bryan A. Kohm
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC

4
5
6

Dated: September 27, 2013

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Carl G. Anderson
Carl G. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc

9
10
11

13

23

dw
Judge E

ER

H

22

RT

21

NO

20

D

TE
GRAN

ard M.

R NIA

19

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge

Chen

FO

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

17

S

16

LI

15

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED.

A

14

UNIT
ED

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE AMENDMENT
TO 3/25/13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

3

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of
perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4
5

Dated: September 27, 2013

FENWICK & WEST LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Bryan A. Kohm
Bryan A. Kohm
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC

8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE AMENDMENT
TO 3/25/13 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

4

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC