Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.

Filing 316

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 315 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (JOINT) filed by Agere Systems LLC, LSI Corporation Case Management Statement due by 8/21/2014. Further Case Management Conference reset for 8/28/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/27/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2014)

1
2
3
4

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378)
865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO. 136411)
[e-mail]
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633)
[e-mail]
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
[e-mail]
DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB NO. 223936)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17

BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC,

18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiffs,
v.
LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS LLC,

Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.

23
24

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc

25

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc. (“Defendants”)

26

(collectively, the “Parties”), stipulate as recited below and jointly request that the Court amend

27

the current case management schedule as set forth below.

28

WHEREAS, the Court held a case management conference on April 22, 2014 to discuss a
JOINT STIPULATION RE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1

case schedule following its order on claim construction, issued April 7, 2014 (Dkt. No. 303);

2
3

WHEREAS, at the April 22, 2014 case management conference, the Court directed that a
further case management conference be held on May 29, 2014;

4

WHEREAS, following submission of letter briefs as directed by the Court at the April 22,

5

2014 case management conference, the Court issued a case scheduling order on May 16, 2014,

6

directing further briefing by the parties regarding claim construction and setting a further claim

7

construction hearing for July 21, 2014 (Dkt. No. 313);

8
9

WHEREAS, the Court’s May 16, 2014 order also directed LSI to elect limited asserted
patents and claims for a first phase of the case within two weeks of the Court’s issuance of a

10

claim construction order, and B&N to elect limited prior art references within two weeks of LSI’s

11

election;

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

WHEREAS, in light of the further claim construction proceedings set by the Court, the

13

parties agree that further efforts to set a case schedule would be more productive following a

14

further claim construction order and the parties’ elections;

15
16
17
18

WHEREAS, the parties expect that these elections will take place prior to August 28,
2014;
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE and jointly request that, in view of the foregoing,
the case management conference currently set for May 29, 2014 be continued to August 28, 2014.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

2

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1

Dated: May 21, 2014

FENWICK & WEST LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC

4
5
6

Dated: May 21, 2014

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Carl G. Anderson
Carl G. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc

9
10
11

13
14

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
The Honorable Edward M. Chen

S

17

19
20

RT

22

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

I

en

d M. Ch

NO

21

United States District Judge

dwar
Judge E

23
24

A

H

ER

LI

18

R NIA

16

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED.

FO

15

UNIT
ED

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

3

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

1
2
3

ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that
the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4
5

Dated: May 21, 2014

FENWICK & WEST LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC

8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION RE FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

4

CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC