Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.
Filing
319
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 318 Stipulation filed by Barnesandnoble.com LLC, Barnes & Noble Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/10/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2014)
1
2
3
4
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378)
865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Email: johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAW
AT
MOUNTAI N VI EW
12
ATTO RNEY S
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
11
David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875 6600
Facsimile: (415) 875 6700
Email: davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com
melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com
CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO. 136411)
cmorrow@fenwick.com
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633)
vdemarchi@fenwick.com
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
hribera@fenwick.com
DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB NO. 223936)
dschumann@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: (650) 988-8500
Facsimile: (650) 938-5200
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC,
22
23
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Plaintiffs,
20
21
Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC-LB
v.
LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS LLC,
Defendants.
24
25
Defendants Agere Systems LLC and LSI Corporation, and plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc.
26
and barnesandnoble.com llc, hereby stipulate and agree that all claims and counterclaims asserted
27
in this action are hereby dismissed without prejudice by agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule
28
41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties further stipulate and agree
JOINT STIPULATION
1
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
1
that each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees in this action.
2
3
Dated: June 6, 2014
FENWICK & WEST LLP
4
5
By: s/ Charlene M. Morrow
Charlene M. Morrow
6
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC
7
8
Dated: June 6, 2014
9
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
10
By: s/ David Eiseman
David Eiseman
LAW
AT
MOUNTAI N VI EW
12
ATTO RNEY S
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION
2
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
ATTESTATION
1
2
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that
3
the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.
4
Dated: June 6, 2014
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
5
6
By: s/ David Eiseman
David Eiseman
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble,
Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc
9
10
LAW
AT
MOUNTAI N VI EW
12
ATTO RNEY S
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION
3
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that, on June 6, 2014, I caused the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION
3
FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be served on Defendants’ counsel via the
4
Court’s ECF system.
5
DATED: June 6, 2014
6
7
By s/ David Eiseman
8
David Eiseman
9
10
RT
U
O
ER
16
R NIA
A
H
15
. Chen
dward M
Judge E
FO
14
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
ODIFIE
AS M
LI
UNIT
ED
LAW
AT
13
RT
ATTO RNEY S
MOUNTAI N VI EW
S
12
IT IS SO ORDERED. ALL DEADLINES AND HEARINGS ARE VACATED.
_________________________
ISTRIC
Edward M. Chen
ES D
TC
AT
U.S. District Judge T
NO
F ENWICK & W ES T LLP
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION
4
CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?