Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.

Filing 319

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 318 Stipulation filed by Barnesandnoble.com LLC, Barnes & Noble Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/10/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378) 865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Email: johnquinn@quinnemanuel.com 5 6 7 8 9 10 LAW AT MOUNTAI N VI EW 12 ATTO RNEY S F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 11 David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758) Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649) Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927) 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875 6600 Facsimile: (415) 875 6700 Email: davideiseman@quinnemanuel.com melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com carlanderson@quinnemanuel.com CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO. 136411) cmorrow@fenwick.com VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO. 168633) vdemarchi@fenwick.com HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511) hribera@fenwick.com DAVID D. SCHUMANN (CSB NO. 223936) dschumann@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC, 22 23 JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, 20 21 Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC-LB v. LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS LLC, Defendants. 24 25 Defendants Agere Systems LLC and LSI Corporation, and plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. 26 and barnesandnoble.com llc, hereby stipulate and agree that all claims and counterclaims asserted 27 in this action are hereby dismissed without prejudice by agreement of the parties pursuant to Rule 28 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties further stipulate and agree JOINT STIPULATION 1 CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC 1 that each party shall bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees in this action. 2 3 Dated: June 6, 2014 FENWICK & WEST LLP 4 5 By: s/ Charlene M. Morrow Charlene M. Morrow 6 Attorneys for Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems LLC 7 8 Dated: June 6, 2014 9 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 10 By: s/ David Eiseman David Eiseman LAW AT MOUNTAI N VI EW 12 ATTO RNEY S F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION 2 CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC ATTESTATION 1 2 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury that 3 the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories. 4 Dated: June 6, 2014 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 5 6 By: s/ David Eiseman David Eiseman 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com llc 9 10 LAW AT MOUNTAI N VI EW 12 ATTO RNEY S F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION 3 CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that, on June 6, 2014, I caused the foregoing JOINT STIPULATION 3 FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE to be served on Defendants’ counsel via the 4 Court’s ECF system. 5 DATED: June 6, 2014 6 7 By s/ David Eiseman 8 David Eiseman 9 10 RT U O ER 16 R NIA A H 15 . Chen dward M Judge E FO 14 ERED O ORD D IT IS S ODIFIE AS M LI UNIT ED LAW AT 13 RT ATTO RNEY S MOUNTAI N VI EW S 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. ALL DEADLINES AND HEARINGS ARE VACATED. _________________________ ISTRIC Edward M. Chen ES D TC AT U.S. District Judge T NO F ENWICK & W ES T LLP 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION 4 CASE NO.: 11-CV-02709 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?