Barnes & Noble Inc. v. LSI Corporation et al.

Filing 65

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE TIME FOR PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES (2/3/12) re 64 Stipulation filed by LSI Corporation, Agere Systems, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/16/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 90378)
Shon Morgan (Bar No. 187736)
865 S Figueroa St 10th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7
8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13

David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. 237649)
Carl G. Anderson (Bar No. 239927)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

CHARLENE M. MORROW (CSB NO.
136411)
[e-mail]
VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI (CSB NO.
168633)
[e-mail]
HECTOR J. RIBERA (CSB NO. 221511)
[e-mail]
RYAN TYZ (CSB NO. 234895)
[e-mail]
RAVI RANGANATH (CSB NO. 272981)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and
Agere Systems Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com llc

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

BARNES & NOBLE, INC. and
BARNESANDNOBLE.COM LLC,

19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
23

LSI CORPORATION and
AGERE SYSTEMS INC.,

Case No. 11-cv-02709 EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
TIME FOR PATENT LOCAL RULE
DISCLOSURES
Trial Date: None set

Defendants.

24
25

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Barnesandnoble.com LLC

26

(“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc. (“Defendants”)

27

(collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate

28

and agree as follows:
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR
PATENT LOCAL RULE DISCLOSURES

11-CV-02709 EMC

1

WHEREAS, on September 30, 2011 the Parties filed a Joint Case Management Statement

2

and Rule 26 Report [Dkt. No. 58], proposing a case schedule that provided, inter alia, for

3

Defendants’ disclosure of asserted claims and infringement contentions on December 27, 2011;

4

WHEREAS, following the Court’s Order denying Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in

5

the Alternative, to Transfer Venue [Dkt. No. 61], on November 1, 2011 Defendants filed their

6

Answer to the Amended Complaint and Counterclaims [Dkt. No. 62] asserting claims for patent

7

infringement;

8
9

WHEREAS, the Court, by Order dated November 2, 2011 [Dkt. No. 63], set a Case
Management Conference in this matter for January 20, 2012;

10

WHEREAS, in view of the provisions of Patent L.R. 3-5(a), the Parties agree that

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

Defendants shall have until February 3, 2012, fourteen days after the scheduled Case

12
F ENWICK & W EST LLP

11

Management Conference, to serve their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement

13

Contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-5 and produce documents pursuant to Patent L.R.

14

3-2;

15

WHEREAS, the Parties do not expect that this proposed date will impact the schedule

16

ultimately set by the Court or alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court Order;

17

THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE that Defendants shall have until February 3, 2012

18

to serve their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions pursuant to Patent

19

L.R. 3-1 and 3-5 and produce documents pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-2.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME
FOR PATENT LOCAL RULE
DISCLOSURES

2

11-CV-02709 EMC

1

Dated: November 14, 2011

FENWICK & WEST LLP

2
3

By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.

4
5
6

Dated: November 14, 2011

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

7
8

By: /s/ Carl G. Anderson
Carl G. Anderson
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Barnes & Noble, Inc. and
barnesandnoble.com LLC

9
10
11

13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO
ORDERED.

19

RT

21

IT

hen
rd M. C

NO

20

Edward M. Chen
ERED
United States District ORD
O Judge
IS S
dwa
Judge E

ER

23

A

H

22

R NIA

18

FO

17

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

16

LI

15

UNIT
ED

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME
FOR PATENT LOCAL RULE
DISCLOSURES

3

11-CV-02709 EMC

1

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45

2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of

3

perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4
5

Dated: November 14, 2011

FENWICK & WEST LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Ravi Ranganath
Ravi Ranganath
Attorneys for Defendants
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.

8
9
10
11

MOUNTAIN VIEW

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

F ENWICK & W EST LLP

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING TIME
FOR PATENT LOCAL RULE
DISCLOSURES

4

11-CV-02709 EMC