Dolis v. Bleum USA Incorporated
Filing
13
ORDER Granting Approval of Substitution of Attorney. Attorney Douglas Evans Dexter terminated. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/01/2011. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
Mark A. Romeo (State Bar No. 173007)
mromeo@crowell.com
CROWELL & MORING LLP
3 Park Plaza, 20th Floor
Irvine, California 92614-8505
Telephone:
(949) 263 8400
Facsimile:
(949) 263 8414
8
Trina McAlister (State Bar No. 253139)
tmcalister@crowell.com
CROWELL & MORING LLP
275 Battery Street, 23rd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
(415) 986-2800
Facsimile:
(415) 986-2827
9
Attorneys for Defendant BLEUM U.S.A., INC.
6
7
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
THOMAS RAYMOND DOLIS,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
v.
BLEUM USA, INCORPORATED,
TEH
Case No. CV-11-2713 MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF
ATTORNEY
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
June 6, 2011
None Set
Defendant.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
CASE NO. CV-11-2713 MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
1
Good cause appearing, the Court orders that the request of defendant Bleum U.S.A., Inc.
2
to substitute Mark A. Romeo (State Bar No. 173007), of Crowell & Moring LLP, 3 Park Plaza,
3
Irvine, California 92714, (949) 263-8400 voice telephone, (949) 263-8414 facsimile,
4
mromeo@crowell.com, as its attorney of record in place and stead of Douglas E. Dexter (State
5
Bar No. 115868), of Farella Braun & Martel LLP, is hereby:
S
BY:
HONORABLE _________________
United States District Court Judge
J
A
H
ER
11
FO
elton E
udge Th
RT
10
rson
. Hende
NO
IRACTIVE-5003866.1
LI
8
9
08/01/2011
R NIA
DATED:
UNIT
ED
7
GRANTED.
RT
U
O
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
1
CASE NO. CV-11-2713 MEJ
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?