Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
10
ORDER Referring Plaintiff to Federal Pro Bono Project and Staying Proceedings Pending Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/18/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
GERALD L. RIGHETTI,
9
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
13
No. C-11-2717 EMC (pr)
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
ORDER REFERRING PLAINTIFF TO
FEDERAL PRO BONO PROJECT AND
STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Defendants.
___________________________________/
14
15
Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED. The Plaintiff having requested
16
and being in need of counsel to assist him in this matter, and good and just cause appearing, Plaintiff
17
is referred to the Federal Pro Bono Project in the manner set forth below so that an attorney may be
18
located for him:
19
(1)
The Clerk shall forward to the Federal Pro Bono Project: (a) a copy of this order, (b)
20
a memorandum outlining the facts and procedural posture of the action, and (c) a copy of the Court
21
file.
22
(2)
Upon an attorney being located to represent Plaintiff, that attorney shall be appointed
23
as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter until further order of the Court.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
(3)
All proceedings in this action are stayed until four weeks from the date an attorney is
appointed to represent Plaintiff in this action.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: January 18, 2012
7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?