Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
143
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 142 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation of Dismissal of the Claim Against Defendant Dr. William Benda, Jr. filed by Gerald Righetti. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/13/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)
Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Doc. 143
she sai
DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
dsnyder@omm.com
DIXIE L. NOONAN (S.B. #257786)
dnoonan@omm.com
MEGHAN K. WOODSOME (S.B. #272459)
mwoodsome@omm.com
LYNDSIE R. SCHMALZ (S.B. #285004)
lschmalz@omm.com
HOAI-MI VU (S.B. #286628)
mvu@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Gerald L. Righetti
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
GERALD L. RIGHETTI,
Plaintiff,
15
16
v.
17
DR. DUC NGUYEN; IDA GUZMAN;
MARCELLA ZUNIGA; DR. WILLIAM
BENDA, JR.; and DR. NEIL RICHMAN,
18
19
Case No. C-11-2717 EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING
STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CLAIM
AGAINST DEFENDANT DR.
WILLIAM BENDA, JR.
Hearing Date: n/a
Time: n/a
Judge: Edward M. Chen
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED DISMISSAL
CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC
Dockets.Justia.com
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims against Defendant
3
Dr. William Benda, Jr. are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs.
11
ER
R NIA
n
FO
M. Che
LI
dward
Judge E
H
10
RT
9
IT IS S
NO
8
D
Hon.O ORDM. Chen
Edward ERE
A
7
__________________________
UNIT
ED
6
8/13/13
Dated: ___________________________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
5
S
4
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED DISMISSAL
CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?