Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 143

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 142 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation of Dismissal of the Claim Against Defendant Dr. William Benda, Jr. filed by Gerald Righetti. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/13/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)

Download PDF
Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Doc. 143 she sai DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003) dsnyder@omm.com DIXIE L. NOONAN (S.B. #257786) dnoonan@omm.com MEGHAN K. WOODSOME (S.B. #272459) mwoodsome@omm.com LYNDSIE R. SCHMALZ (S.B. #285004) lschmalz@omm.com HOAI-MI VU (S.B. #286628) mvu@omm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gerald L. Righetti 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 GERALD L. RIGHETTI, Plaintiff, 15 16 v. 17 DR. DUC NGUYEN; IDA GUZMAN; MARCELLA ZUNIGA; DR. WILLIAM BENDA, JR.; and DR. NEIL RICHMAN, 18 19 Case No. C-11-2717 EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF CLAIM AGAINST DEFENDANT DR. WILLIAM BENDA, JR. Hearing Date: n/a Time: n/a Judge: Edward M. Chen Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED DISMISSAL CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that all claims against Defendant 3 Dr. William Benda, Jr. are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 11 ER R NIA n FO M. Che LI dward Judge E H 10 RT 9 IT IS S NO 8 D Hon.O ORDM. Chen Edward ERE A 7 __________________________ UNIT ED 6 8/13/13 Dated: ___________________________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 5 S 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED DISMISSAL CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?