Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
69
ORDER re 68 Notice of Additional Counsel filed by Gerald Righetti. Signed by Judge Edward M.Chen on 9/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DARIN W. SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
dsnyder@omm.com
LORIN M. KLINE (S.B. #275263)
lkline@omm.com
MEGHAN K. WOODSOME (S.B. #272459)
mwoodsome@omm.com
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Gerald L. Righetti
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
GERALD L. RIGHETTI,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,
et al.,
Case No. C-11-2717 EMC
Addition
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF
COUNSEL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
THEREON
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION
1
2
TO THE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD
HEREIN:
3
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Gerald L. Righetti and his counsel of record,
4
O’Melveny & Myers LLP, hereby add Meghan Woodsome, an associate at O’Melveny & Myers,
5
as attorney of record for Mr. Righetti in the above-captioned matter.
6
7
Dated: September 27, 2012
8
DARIN W. SNYDER
MEGHAN K. WOODSOME
O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
9
10
11
By: /s/ Meghan K. Woodsome
Meghan K. Woodsome
Attorneys for Plaintiff
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The above Substitution is hereby approved.
ER
H
9
10
R NIA
n
M. Che
FO
dward
Judge E
LI
RT
8
IT
NO
7
__________________________
Hon. Edward M. Chen ED
ER
UnitedIS SO ORD Judge
States District
A
6
UNIT
ED
5
9/28
Dated: ____ __, 2012
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
4
S
3
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER APPROVING
SUBSTITUTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?