Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Filing
78
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 77 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint as to Defendant Benda filed by Gerald Righetti. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/29/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DARIN SNYDER (S.B. #136003)
dsnyder@omm.com
MEGHAN K. WOODSOME (S.B. #272459)
mwoodsome@omm.com
O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3823
Telephone:
(415) 984-8700
Facsimile:
(415) 984-8701
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Gerald L. Righetti
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GERALD L. RIGHETTI,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION,
et al.,
Case No. C-11-2717 EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO
DEFENDANT BENDA
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Courtroom: 5 (17th Floor)
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING EXTENSION
CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION
On October 25, 2012, pursuant to this Court’s Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff
3
Gerald Righetti and Defendant William Benda Jr., by and through their counsel, filed a stipulation
4
to extend Mr. Righetti’s time to file an amended complaint against Dr. Benda by fourteen days.
5
Any amended complaint as to Dr. Benda must be filed no later than Friday, November 16, 2012.
6
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
RT
14
J
ER
16
R NIA
A
H
15
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
NO
13
FO
12
RED
ORDE
HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
T IS SO
I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LI
October 29, 2012
Dated: __________________________
UNIT
ED
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
10
S
9
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING EXTENSION
CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?