Righetti v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 78

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 77 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint as to Defendant Benda filed by Gerald Righetti. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/29/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DARIN SNYDER (S.B. #136003) dsnyder@omm.com MEGHAN K. WOODSOME (S.B. #272459) mwoodsome@omm.com O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 Telephone: (415) 984-8700 Facsimile: (415) 984-8701 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gerald L. Righetti 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GERALD L. RIGHETTI, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., Case No. C-11-2717 EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AS TO DEFENDANT BENDA Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen Courtroom: 5 (17th Floor) Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION On October 25, 2012, pursuant to this Court’s Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff 3 Gerald Righetti and Defendant William Benda Jr., by and through their counsel, filed a stipulation 4 to extend Mr. Righetti’s time to file an amended complaint against Dr. Benda by fourteen days. 5 Any amended complaint as to Dr. Benda must be filed no later than Friday, November 16, 2012. 6 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 RT 14 J ER 16 R NIA A H 15 . Chen ward M udge Ed NO 13 FO 12 RED ORDE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN T IS SO I UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LI October 29, 2012 Dated: __________________________ UNIT ED 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 10 S 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION CASE NO. C-11-2717 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?