Bonato v. Yahoo! Inc. et al
Filing
61
ORDER Continuing CMC re 60 Stipulation filed by Jerry Yang, Carol A. Bartz, Yahoo! Inc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 9/9/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2011)
Case3:11-cv-02732-CRB Document60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Filed09/07/11 Page1 of 5
JORDAN ETH (CA SBN 121617)
JEth@mofo.com
ANNA ERICKSON WHITE (CA SBN 161385)
AWhite@mofo.com
MARK R.S. FOSTER (CA SBN 223682)
MFoster@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants
Yahoo! Inc., Carol A. Bartz, and Jerry Yang
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
VINCE BONATO, Individually and on Behalf of
All Others Similarly Situated,
Case No.
3:11-cv-02732-CRB
CLASS ACTION
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
18
YAHOO! INC., CAROL A. BARTZ and
JERRY YANG,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE UNTIL AFTER THE
COURT APPOINTS LEAD
PLAINTIFF AND LEAD COUNSEL
Defendants.
[Civil L.R. 6-1(b)]
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION CONTINUING INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:11-cv-02732-CRB
sf-3041232
Case3:11-cv-02732-CRB Document60
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Filed09/07/11 Page2 of 5
RECITALS
A.
Named plaintiff Vince Bonato commenced this purported securities class action on
June 6, 2011;
B.
This action is governed by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,
15 U.S.C. § 78u-4 et seq. (the “Reform Act”);
C.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Reform Act, competing motions for appointment
of lead plaintiff and lead counsel were filed on August 5, 2011;
8
D.
A hearing on the motions is scheduled for October 14, 2011, at 10:00 a.m.;
9
E.
The Initial Case Management Conference (“CMC”) for this action is presently set
10
11
for September 16, 2011, at 8:30 a.m.;
F.
All parties and movants agree that continuing the CMC until after the Court
12
appoints a lead plaintiff and lead counsel pursuant to the Reform Act is prudent and will conserve
13
party and judicial resources.
14
15
16
STIPULATION
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties and movants hereby stipulate pursuant to Civil Local
Rule 6-1(b) and subject to Court approval as follows:
17
1.
18
calendar.
19
2.
The CMC, presently set for September 16, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., shall be taken off
Defendants will meet and confer with the court-appointed lead counsel within
20
fourteen days after the Court makes its appointment to discuss the schedule in this action,
21
including the rescheduling of the CMC to a date that is convenient to the Court’s calendar.
22
23
Dated: September 7, 2011
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By:
24
/s/ Mark R.S. Foster
Attorneys for Defendants Yahoo! Inc.,
Carol A. Bartz, and Jerry Yang
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION CONTINUING INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:11-cv-02732-CRB
sf-3041232
1
Case3:11-cv-02732-CRB Document60
1
Dated: September 7, 2011
Filed09/07/11 Page3 of 5
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN
& DOWD LLP
2
By:
3
/s/ Christopher P. Seefer
Attorneys for Plaintiff Vince Bonato
and Proposed Lead Plaintiff the
Pension Trust Fund for Operating
Engineers
4
5
6
7
Dated: September 7, 2011
8
BERSTEIN LIEBHARD LLP
By:
9
/s/ Joseph R. Seidman, Jr.
Attorneys for Proposed Lead Plaintiff
Adar Investment Fund, Ltd.
10
11
12
Dated: September 7, 2011
SCOTT+SCOTT LLP
By:
13
/s/ Joseph D. Cohen
Attorneys for Proposed Lead Plaintiff
Alan Hertz
14
15
16
Dated: September 7, 2011
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
17
By:
/s/ Reed R. Kathrein
18
Attorneys for Proposed Lead Plaintiff
Peter Lewis
19
20
21
Dated: September 7, 2011
22
BERMAN DEVALERIO
By:
23
/s/ Anthony Phillips
Liaison Counsel for Proposed
Lead Plaintiff Thomas Burriss
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION CONTINUING INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:11-cv-02732-CRB
sf-3041232
2
Case3:11-cv-02732-CRB Document60
1
2
3
Filed09/07/11 Page4 of 5
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered the Joint Stipulation of the parties and movants, and for good cause
shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
4
1.
5
calendar.
6
2.
The CMC, presently set for September 16, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., shall be taken off
Defendants shall meet and confer with the court-appointed lead counsel within
7
fourteen days after the Court makes its appointment to discuss the schedule in this action,
8
including the rescheduling of the CMC to a date that is convenient to the Court’s calendar.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
12
Dated: _______________, 2011
September 9
S
RT
18
ER
20
er
R. Brey
H
19
R NIA
harles
Judge C
NO
17
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
FO
16
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LI
UNIT
ED
15
RT
U
O
14
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
13
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION CONTINUING INITIAL CMC
Case No. 3:11-cv-02732-CRB
sf-3041232
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?