Bonato v. Yahoo! Inc. et al

Filing 65

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 28 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel; granting 31 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel; denying 15 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 No. C 11-02732 CRB VINCE BONATO, ORDER APPOINTING LEAD PLAINTIFF Plaintiff, v. YAHOO INC, Defendant. / 16 17 Now before the Court are various motions for appointment as lead plaintiff and for 18 approval of lead counsel. Having carefully reviewed the papers submitted by all parties, the 19 Court concludes pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b) that oral argument is unnecessary. The 20 hearing scheduled for October 14, 2011 is hereby VACATED. All parties besides Pension 21 Trust Fund for Operating Engineers (“Pension Trust Fund”) have either withdrawn their 22 motions, failed to oppose Pension Trust Fund’s Motion, or stated their non-opposition to 23 Pension Trust Fund’s Motion. Thus, the Court ORDERS as follows: 24 25 26 1. Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers’ Motion for Appointment as Lead Plaintiff and for Approval of Lead Plaintiff’s Selection of Lead Counsel is GRANTED; 2. The Court, having considered the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation 27 Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B), hereby appoints the Pension Trust Fund as 28 Lead Plaintiff; and 1 2 3 3. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), Lead Plaintiff’s selection of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as lead counsel for the class is approved. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 12, 2011 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 G:\CRBALL\2011\2732\Order Appointing Lead Counsel.wpd 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?