Bonato v. Yahoo! Inc. et al
Filing
65
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer denying 28 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel; granting 31 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel; denying 15 Motion to Appoint Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
No. C 11-02732 CRB
VINCE BONATO,
ORDER APPOINTING LEAD
PLAINTIFF
Plaintiff,
v.
YAHOO INC,
Defendant.
/
16
17
Now before the Court are various motions for appointment as lead plaintiff and for
18
approval of lead counsel. Having carefully reviewed the papers submitted by all parties, the
19
Court concludes pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b) that oral argument is unnecessary. The
20
hearing scheduled for October 14, 2011 is hereby VACATED. All parties besides Pension
21
Trust Fund for Operating Engineers (“Pension Trust Fund”) have either withdrawn their
22
motions, failed to oppose Pension Trust Fund’s Motion, or stated their non-opposition to
23
Pension Trust Fund’s Motion. Thus, the Court ORDERS as follows:
24
25
26
1. Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers’ Motion for Appointment as Lead
Plaintiff and for Approval of Lead Plaintiff’s Selection of Lead Counsel is GRANTED;
2. The Court, having considered the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
27
Reform Act of 1995, 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B), hereby appoints the Pension Trust Fund as
28
Lead Plaintiff; and
1
2
3
3. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(v), Lead Plaintiff’s selection of Robbins
Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP as lead counsel for the class is approved.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 12, 2011
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2011\2732\Order Appointing Lead Counsel.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?