Jackson v. Fischer et al

Filing 44

ORDER GRANTING 38 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 10/12/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)

Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Filed10/10/11 Page1 of 4

PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
Vernon H. Granneman (SBN 83532)
[e-mail]
Dianne L. Sweeney (SBN 187198)
[e-mail]
2475 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1114
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY LLP
Bret A. Puls, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice application to be filed forthwith)
[e-mail]
Samuel R. Hellfeld (SBN 234421)
[e-mail]
45 South Seventh Street, Suite 3300
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

12
13

Attorneys for Defendant
DAVID GOLDSTEEN

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

SUZANNE D. JACKSON,
Plaintiff,

19
20
21

Case No. 3:11-cv-02753-JSW

v.

26

WILLIAM FISCHER; JON SABES;
STEVEN SABES; DAVID GOLDSTEEN;
MARVIN SIEGEL; BRIAN CAMPION;
LONNIE BROOKBINDER; CHETAN
N ORBIT, LLC ; SPECIGEN, INC. ; PEER
DREAMS INC.; NOTEBOOKZ INC.;
ILEONARDO.COM INC.; NEW MOON LLC;
MONVIA LLC; and SAZANI BEACH
HOTEL,

27

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
DECLARATION OF SAMUEL R.
HELLFELD IN SUPPORT

Defendants.

22
23
24
25

28
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] OR EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

1

Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document38

1
2
3

Filed10/10/11 Page2 of 4

Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson and Defendant David Goldsteen, by and through their counsel, and
subject to the Court’s approval, stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiff served her complaint on Defendant Goldsteen on August 27, 2011;

4
5
6
7

WHEREAS, on September 15, 2011, Plaintiff and Defendant Goldsteen filed a Stipulation to
extend the time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint to October 11, 2011, which was
entered by the Court on September 16, 2011 (Dkt. No. 24).

8

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant Goldsteen have agreed to a further, one-week extension

9

of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on October 18, 2011 in order to afford

10

counsel for both parties the opportunity to continue their discussions regarding the complaint and a

11
potential early resolution of this matter.
12
13

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN

14

THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court’s approval, Defendant Goldsteen shall answer or otherwise

15

respond to the complaint on or before October 18, 2011.

16

Dated: October 10, 2011

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP

17

By:__/s/ Robert J. Stump______________
Robert J. Stump
Attorney for Plaintiff Suzanne D. Jackson

18
19
20

Dated: October 10, 2011

OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY, LLP

21

By:_/s/ Samuel R. Hellfeld_____________
Samuel R. Hellfeld
Attorney for Defendant David Goldsteen

22
23
24

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

25

Dated: October___, 2011
12

26

________________________________________
The Honorable Jeffrey S. White

27
28
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] OR EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

2

OPPENHEIMER: 2901278 v01 10/10/2011