Jackson v. Fischer et al

Filing 65

ORDER GRANTING 63 Stipulation of Continuance. Signed by Judge James Ware for Judge Jeffrey S. White on January 11, 2012. (jswlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document63 Filed01/10/12 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5

Theodore A. Griffinger, Jr. (SBN 66028)
Tanya Herrera (SBN 177790)
STEIN & LUBIN LLP
Transamerica Pyramid
600 Montgomery Street, 14th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6
7

Attorneys for Defendants,
JON SABES, STEVEN SABES AND MARVIN
SIEGEL

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13

SUZANNE D. JACKSON,

Case No. 3:11-cv-02753-JSC

Plaintiff,

14
15

v.

16

WILLIAM FISCHER; JON SABES;
STEVEN SABES; DAVID GOLDSTEEN;
MARVIN SIEGEL; BRIAN CAMPION;
LONNIE BROOKBINDER; CHETAN
NARSUDE; MANI KOOLASURIYA;
JOSHUA ROSEN; UPPER ORBIT, LLC;
SPECIGEN, INC.; PEER DREAMS INC.;
NOTEBOOKZ INC.; ILEONARDO.COM
INC.; NEW MOON LLC; MONVIA LLC;
and SAZANI BEACH HOTEL,

17
18
19
20

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
DECLARATION OF TANYA HERRERA
IN SUPPORT

21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 3:11-cv-02753-JSC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
DECLARATION OF TANYA HERRERA IN SUPPORT

0690115/452741v1

Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document63 Filed01/10/12 Page2 of 4

1

Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson and defendants Marvin Siegel, Jon Sabes and Steven

2

Sabes, (together “Defendants”), by and through their counsel, and subject to the Court’s approval,

3

stipulate as follows:

4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff served her First Amended Complaint on December 5, 2011;

5

WHEREAS, the parties previously stipulated that Defendants’ last day to answer

6

or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint would be January 13, 2011;

7
8

WHEREAS, Defendants have requested an additional extension of time to answer
or otherwise respond to the First Amended;

9
10

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to extend Defendants’ time to answer or
otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to January 27, 2012;

11
12

WHEREAS, Defendants have agreed that Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion to
dismiss will be due on or before February 24, 2012;

13

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND

14

BETWEEN THE PARTIES that, subject to the Court’s approval, Defendants shall answer or

15

otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint on or before January 27, 2012.

16
17

Dated: January 9, 2012

SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER
& HAMPTON LLP

18
By:

19
20
21

Dated: January 9, 2012

/s/ Robert J. Stumpf, Jr.
Robert J. Stumpf, Jr.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SUZANNE D. JACKSON
STEIN & LUBIN LLP

22
By:

23
24
25

/s/ Tanya Herrera
Tanya Herrera
Attorneys for Defendants
MARVIN SIEGEL, JON SABES and STEVEN
SABES

26
27
28
2
Case No. 3:11-cv-02753-JSC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
DECLARATION OF TANYA HERRERA IN SUPPORT

0690115/452741v1

Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document63 Filed01/10/12 Page3 of 4

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED

2
3

January 11, 2012
Dated: _____________________

4

____________________________________
By: CHIEF JUDGE JAMES WARE

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 3:11-cv-02753-JSC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
DECLARATION OF TANYA HERRERA IN SUPPORT

0690115/452741v1