Jackson v. Fischer et al
Filing
81
ORDER GRANTING 80 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Motions to Dismiss and to Reply. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/22/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)
Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document80 Filed02/21/12 Page1 of 6
1 KAUFMAN LLC
ALAN H. KAUFMAN
2 445 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10022
3 Telephone: 646-820-6550
Facsimile:
646-820-6568
Appearing Pro Hac Vice
4
5 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
6
7
8
9
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
ROBERT J. STUMPF, JR., Cal. Bar No. 72851
rstumpf@sheppardmullin.com
Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4109
Telephone:
415-434-9100
Facsimile:
415-434-3947
10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Suzanne D. Jackson
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15 SUZANNE D. JACKSON,
Plaintiff,
16
17
v.
18 WILLIAM FISCHER, JON SABES, STEVEN
19
20
21
22
23
Case No. CV 11-2753 JSW
SABES, DAVID GOLDSTEEN, MARVIN
SIEGEL, BRIAN CAMPION, LONNIE
BOOKBINDER, CHETAN NARSUDE,
MANI KOOLASURIYA, JOSHUA ROSEN,
UPPER ORBIT, LLC, SPECIGEN, INC.,
PEER DREAMS INC., NOTEBOOKZ INC.,
ILEONARDO.COM INC., NEW MOON
LLC, MONVIA LLC, and SAZANI BEACH
HOTEL,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS
AND TO REPLY; DECLARATION OF
ROBERT J. STUMPF IN SUPPORT
THEREOF
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
W02-WEST:5DAS1\404661642.2
STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTIONS
Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document80 Filed02/21/12 Page2 of 6
STIPULATION
1
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, it is hereby
3 stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that:
4
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson ("Jackson") filed and served her First Amended
5 Complaint on December 5, 2011;
6
WHEREAS, Jackson and Defendants William Fischer, Upper Orbit LLC, Jon Sabes,
7 Steven Sabes, Marvin Siegel, Mani Koolasuriya, Monvia LLC, Chetan Narsude and New Moon
8 LLC ("Defendants") previously stipulated that Defendants’ last day to answer or otherwise
9 respond to the First Amended Complaint would be January 13, 2012;
10
WHEREAS, Defendants requested an additional extension of time to answer or otherwise
11 respond to the First Amended;
12
WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to extend Defendants’ time to answer or
13 otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to January 27, 2012;
14
WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff’s opposition to the motions to
15 dismiss would be due on or before February 24, 2012;
16
WHEREAS, Jackson requested an additional extension of time to oppose the motions to
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
dismiss, to March 16, 2012;
WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff’s opposition to the motions to dismiss would
be due on or before March 16, 2012;
WHEREAS the parties further agreed that Defendants would have an extension of time to
file replies on their motions to dismiss, such that they would be due on or before April 9, 2012;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to
the Court’s approval, Plaintiff shall file and serve her opposition to Defendants’ motions to
dismiss on or before March 16, 2012, and Defendants shall file and serve their reply papers on or
before April 9, 2012.
26
27
28
W02-WEST:5DAS1\404661642.2
-1-
STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTIONS
Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document80 Filed02/21/12 Page3 of 6
1 Dated: February 21, 2012
2
3
Dated: February 21, 2012
4
5
6
Dated: February 21, 2012
7
8
9
Dated: February 21, 2012
10
11
12
/s/ Robert J. Stumpf, Jr.
Robert J. Stumpf, Jr.
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson
/s/ Peter C. McMahon
Peter C. McMahon
MCMAHON SEREPCA LLP
Attorneys for Defendants William Fischer and Upper
Orbit, LLC
/s/ Tanya Herrera
Tanya Herrera
STEIN & LUBIN LLP
Attorneys for Defendants Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes,
and Marvin Siegel
/s/ Tom Chia-Kai Wang
Tom Chia-Kai Wang
LAW OFFICES OF TOM CHIA-KAI WANG
Attorneys for Defendants Chetan Narsude, Mani
Kulasooriya, Monvia LLC, and New Moon LLC
13
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Robert
14 J. Stumpf, Jr. hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
15
16
17
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 22
Dated: _______________, 2012
18
_______________________________
The Hon. Jeffrey S. White
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
W02-WEST:5DAS1\404661642.2
-2-
STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO MOTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?