Jackson v. Fischer et al

Filing 81

ORDER GRANTING 80 STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Motions to Dismiss and to Reply. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/22/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document80 Filed02/21/12 Page1 of 6 1 KAUFMAN LLC ALAN H. KAUFMAN 2 445 Park Avenue New York, New York 10022 3 Telephone: 646-820-6550 Facsimile: 646-820-6568 Appearing Pro Hac Vice 4 5 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP 6 7 8 9 A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations ROBERT J. STUMPF, JR., Cal. Bar No. 72851 rstumpf@sheppardmullin.com Four Embarcadero Center, 17th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4109 Telephone: 415-434-9100 Facsimile: 415-434-3947 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff Suzanne D. Jackson 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 SUZANNE D. JACKSON, Plaintiff, 16 17 v. 18 WILLIAM FISCHER, JON SABES, STEVEN 19 20 21 22 23 Case No. CV 11-2753 JSW SABES, DAVID GOLDSTEEN, MARVIN SIEGEL, BRIAN CAMPION, LONNIE BOOKBINDER, CHETAN NARSUDE, MANI KOOLASURIYA, JOSHUA ROSEN, UPPER ORBIT, LLC, SPECIGEN, INC., PEER DREAMS INC., NOTEBOOKZ INC., ILEONARDO.COM INC., NEW MOON LLC, MONVIA LLC, and SAZANI BEACH HOTEL, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO REPLY; DECLARATION OF ROBERT J. STUMPF IN SUPPORT THEREOF Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 W02-WEST:5DAS1\404661642.2 STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document80 Filed02/21/12 Page2 of 6 STIPULATION 1 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Civil L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, it is hereby 3 stipulated by and between the parties, through their respective attorneys, that: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson ("Jackson") filed and served her First Amended 5 Complaint on December 5, 2011; 6 WHEREAS, Jackson and Defendants William Fischer, Upper Orbit LLC, Jon Sabes, 7 Steven Sabes, Marvin Siegel, Mani Koolasuriya, Monvia LLC, Chetan Narsude and New Moon 8 LLC ("Defendants") previously stipulated that Defendants’ last day to answer or otherwise 9 respond to the First Amended Complaint would be January 13, 2012; 10 WHEREAS, Defendants requested an additional extension of time to answer or otherwise 11 respond to the First Amended; 12 WHEREAS, Plaintiff agreed to extend Defendants’ time to answer or 13 otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to January 27, 2012; 14 WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff’s opposition to the motions to 15 dismiss would be due on or before February 24, 2012; 16 WHEREAS, Jackson requested an additional extension of time to oppose the motions to 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 dismiss, to March 16, 2012; WHEREAS, Defendants agreed that Plaintiff’s opposition to the motions to dismiss would be due on or before March 16, 2012; WHEREAS the parties further agreed that Defendants would have an extension of time to file replies on their motions to dismiss, such that they would be due on or before April 9, 2012; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT, subject to the Court’s approval, Plaintiff shall file and serve her opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss on or before March 16, 2012, and Defendants shall file and serve their reply papers on or before April 9, 2012. 26 27 28 W02-WEST:5DAS1\404661642.2 -1- STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS Case3:11-cv-02753-JSW Document80 Filed02/21/12 Page3 of 6 1 Dated: February 21, 2012 2 3 Dated: February 21, 2012 4 5 6 Dated: February 21, 2012 7 8 9 Dated: February 21, 2012 10 11 12 /s/ Robert J. Stumpf, Jr. Robert J. Stumpf, Jr. SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Suzanne Jackson /s/ Peter C. McMahon Peter C. McMahon MCMAHON SEREPCA LLP Attorneys for Defendants William Fischer and Upper Orbit, LLC /s/ Tanya Herrera Tanya Herrera STEIN & LUBIN LLP Attorneys for Defendants Jon Sabes, Steven Sabes, and Marvin Siegel /s/ Tom Chia-Kai Wang Tom Chia-Kai Wang LAW OFFICES OF TOM CHIA-KAI WANG Attorneys for Defendants Chetan Narsude, Mani Kulasooriya, Monvia LLC, and New Moon LLC 13 Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Robert 14 J. Stumpf, Jr. hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained. 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. February 22 Dated: _______________, 2012 18 _______________________________ The Hon. Jeffrey S. White 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 W02-WEST:5DAS1\404661642.2 -2- STIP AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTIONS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?