Nelson v. Sanofi Aventis U.S., LLC
Filing
23
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER Case referred to Private ADR. Further Case Management Conference set for 9/13/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 2/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francis co before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Jury Trial set for 2/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 2/7/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/15/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/16/2011)
*E-Filed 9/16/11*
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
LANEY NELSON,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
No. C 11-02756 RS
CASE MANAGEMENT
SCHEDULING ORDER
SANOFI AVENTIS U.S., LLC and DOES 1
through 10, inclusive,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case
20
Management Conference on September 15, 2011. After considering the Joint Case Management
21
Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and
22
good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
23
1.
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION. The parties have agreed to participate
24
in private mediation within 180 days. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case
25
is resolved at the mediation.
26
27
2.
DISCOVERY. On or before November 19, 2012, all non-expert discovery shall be
completed by the parties.
28
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
NO. C 11-02756 RS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
3.
EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions
shall proceed as follows:
A. On or before November 26, 2012, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
B. On or before December 24, 2012, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports
in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2).
C. On or before January 21, 2013, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed.
4.
FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case Management
Conference shall be held on September 13, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file a
12
Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference.
13
14
15
5.
PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to
Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than January 3, 2013.
6.
PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet and
16
confer to discuss preparation of a joint pretrial statement, and on or before January 24, 2013,
17
counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement.
18
7.
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on February
19
7, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate
20
Avenue, San Francisco, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case shall attend
21
personally.
22
8.
TRIAL DATE. Jury trial shall commence on February 25, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., in
23
Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
24
California.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
NO. C 11-02756 RS
27
28
2
1
2
DATED: 9/15/11
_______________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER
NO. C 11-02756 RS
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?