The Commonwealth of Virginia v. McKesson Corporation et al
Filing
92
ORDER by Judge Susan Illston granting 91 Stipulation Regarding Outstanding Discovery Disputes filed by McKesson Corporation (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)
Case3:11-cv-02782-SI Document91 Filed06/21/13 Page1 of 5
1
7
MELVIN R. GOLDMAN (CA SBN 34097)
MGoldman@mofo.com
JAMES P. BENNETT (CA SBN 65179)
JBennett@mofo.com
PAUL FLUM (CA SBN 104424)
PaulFlum@mofo.com
RYAN G. HASSANEIN (CA SBN 221146)
RHassanein@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
8
Attorneys for Defendant McKesson Corporation
2
3
4
5
6
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff,
v.
MCKESSON CORPORATION
Case No.
C 11-02782 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING
DISCOVERY DISPUTES
Trial Date: November 18, 2013
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES
CASE NO. C11-02782 SI
Case3:11-cv-02782-SI Document91 Filed06/21/13 Page2 of 5
1
2
3
WHEREAS, fact discovery in this matter closed on Monday, June 17, 2013, and trial is
scheduled to begin on November 18, 2013.
WHEREAS, Defendant McKesson Corporation and Plaintiff Commonwealth of Virginia
4
(collectively the “Parties”) are in the process of meeting and conferring pursuant Section 2 of this
5
Court’s Standing Order regarding certain discovery disputes.
6
WHEREAS, Section 2 of this Court’s Standing Order provides that if litigants cannot
7
resolve discovery disputes informally through the meet and confer process, they shall submit a
8
joint statement to the Court stating the nature and status of their dispute, and further provides that,
9
after considering the joint statement, the Court will advise the parties regarding the need, if any,
10
11
12
13
for more formal briefing or a hearing, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).
WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 37-3, all motions to compel must be filed no more
than seven days after the close of discovery, i.e., June 21, 2013.
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to continue their meet and confer discussions and believe
14
that it would be beneficial to establish a July 8, 2013 deadline to submit a joint statement if they
15
are unable to fully resolve the current discovery disputes.
16
NOW THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL, THE PARTIES STIPULATE
17
that the deadline to comply with the provisions of the Court’s Standing Order regarding discovery
18
disputes, including the submission of a joint statement regarding any matters that remain in
19
dispute after conclusion of the meet and confer process, shall be July 8, 2013, without waiver of
20
their right to file a motion to compel thereafter if authorized by the Court.
21
22
The PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATE that this Stipulation and Proposed Order shall not
be the basis for any Party to seek a continuance of the trial date or any other case deadline.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES
CASE NO. C11-02782 SI
1
Case3:11-cv-02782-SI Document91 Filed06/21/13 Page3 of 5
1
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: June 21, 2013
3
4
MELVIN R. GOLDMAN
PAUL FLUM
JAMES P. BENNETT
RYAN G. HASSANEIN
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
5
By: /s/ Paul Flum
Paul Flum
6
7
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
8
9
Counsel for Defendants
MCKESSON CORPORATION
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Dated: June 21, 2013
STEVE W. BERMAN
BARBARA A. MAHONEY
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
By: /s/ Barbara A. Mahoney
Barbara A. Mahoney
Steve W. Berman
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: (206) 623-7292
Facsimile: (206) 623-0594
steve@hbsslaw.com
barbaram@hbsslaw.com
Jeff D. Friedman
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
715 Hearst Avenue, Suite 202
Berkeley, California 94710
Telephone: (510) 725-3000
Facsimile: (510) 725-3001
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES
CASE NO. C11-02782 SI
2
Case3:11-cv-02782-SI Document91 Filed06/21/13 Page4 of 5
1
Jennifer Fountain Connolly
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1629 K St. NW, Suite 300
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: (202) 355-6435
Facsimile: (202) 355-6455
2
3
4
Lelia P. Winget-Hernandez
Assistant Attorney General
VIRGINIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL
900 East Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Telephone: (804) 786-1584
Facsimile: (804) 786-0807
5
6
7
8
9
10
Counsel for Plaintiff
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
11
12
13
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
Dated: June ___, 2013
21
___________________________
Hon. Susan Illston
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES
CASE NO. C11-02782 SI
3
Case3:11-cv-02782-SI Document91 Filed06/21/13 Page5 of 5
1
GENERAL ORDER 45 ATTESTATION
2
I, Paul Flum, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Outstanding Discovery Disputes. In compliance
4
with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Barbara Mahoney has concurred in this filing.
5
Dated: June 21, 2013
6
7
By:
/s/ Paul Flum
PAUL FLUM
Counsel for Defendant
MCKESSON CORPORATION
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES
CASE NO. C11-02782 SI
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?