Nary v. Hartley

Filing 8

ORDER for extension of time to respond re 7 Stipulation filed by Steven Robert Nary, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 7 Stipulation, 4 MOTION to Dismiss. Responses due by 11/29/2011.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/18/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)

Case3:11-cv-02795-CRB Document7

1
2
3
4
5
6

Filed10/12/11 Page1 of 2

STEVEN F. GRUEL (CSBN 213148)
315 Montgomery Street, 9th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone Number [phone]
Fax Number [phone]
[e-mail]
www.gruellaw.com

Attorney for Steven Robert Nary

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

STEVEN ROBERT NARY,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Petitioner,
Vs.
JAMES D. HARTLEY,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. C-11-02795-CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
PERMITTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
Honorable Charles R. Breyer

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Respondent, by his attorney, Deputy

20

Attorney General Stacey D. Schesser and the Petitioner, by his attorney, Steven F. Gruel, that the

21

Petitioner, with the Court’s permission, may have until November 29, 2011 to respond to

22

Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss. This request is predicated on the fact that counsel for the

23

Petitioner has an extremely pressing work schedule which includes finishing several opening

24

briefs due in the next few weeks in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals; several ongoing cases

25

involving state and federal criminal prosecutions including prosecutions outside the Northern

26
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

Case3:11-cv-02795-CRB Document7

Filed10/12/11 Page2 of 2

1

District of California. The Respondent does not oppose Petitioner’s request for an extension of

2

time to respond.

3

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

4
5

Dated: October 11, 2011

__/s/_________________
STEVEN F. GRUEL
Attorney for Steven Robert Nary

Dated: October 11, 2011

_____/s/______________
STACEY D. SCHESSER
Attorney for James D. Hartley

6
7
8
9
10

[PROPOSED] ORDER

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated:

17

Oct. 18, 2011

18

RT
U
O

16

S DISTRICT
TE
C
______________________________
TA
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Court

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

19

ER

LI

J

A

H

22

RT

21

. Breyer

arles R
udge Ch

NO

20

R NIA

15

FO

14

shall be filed on or before November 29, 2011.

S

13

As stipulated above, the Petitioner’s response to the Respondent’s Motion To Dismiss

UNIT
ED

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

23
24
25
26
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

C