Morrison et al v. T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. et al
Filing
47
ORDER GRANTING re 46 Letter filed by T. Rowe Price Services Inc, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Trust Company For Diane P. Cragg to attend the 3/1/13 discovery hearing in lieu of lead trial counsel. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/27/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2013)
Heidi C. Quan
hquan@murchisonlaw.com
415.524.4303 Direct Dial
February 26, 2013
VIA ECF ELECTRONIC SYSTEM
Magistrate Justice Joseph C. Spero
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA
Re:
Ashley Morrison vs. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., et al.
Our File No:
34127
Dear Judge Spero:
Pursuant to your clerk’s instruction, please allow this to serve as a joint request by all
parties to allow Diane P. Cragg, Esq. to attend the discovery hearing in the abovereferenced matter in place of the undersigned who is lead trial attorney. Unfortunately, I
am not available for the 9:30 a.m. hearing on March 1, 2013 (or any of the alternative
dates provided). However, Ms. Cragg is the attorney who handled the discovery that is
in dispute, as well as the subsequent meet and confer efforts. Ms. Cragg will be fully
informed to discuss the matter and will abide and consent to all of the Court’s decisions
as a result of the hearing. Opposing counsel has graciously waived attendance of the
undersigned as lead trial counsel for the purposes of the March 1, 2013 hearing. Thus,
we respectfully and jointly request the Court’s permission to allow Diane P. Cragg, Esq.
to represent defendants at the discovery hearing.
RT
HCQ:ed
cc:
A
H
ER
Spero
seph C.
FO
NO
Judge Jo
R NIA
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
LI
UNIT
ED
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
Dated: 2/27/13
S
Thank you.
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
Jonathan B. Gaskin
C
Very truly yours,
MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP
/s/ Heidi C. Quan
Heidi C. Quan
Magistrate Justice Joseph C. Spero
February 26, 2013
Page 2
Kaufhold Gaskin, LLP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?