Morrison et al v. T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. et al

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING re 46 Letter filed by T. Rowe Price Services Inc, T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Trust Company For Diane P. Cragg to attend the 3/1/13 discovery hearing in lieu of lead trial counsel. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/27/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2013)

Download PDF
Heidi C. Quan 415.524.4303 Direct Dial February 26, 2013 VIA ECF ELECTRONIC SYSTEM Magistrate Justice Joseph C. Spero 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA Re: Ashley Morrison vs. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., et al. Our File No: 34127 Dear Judge Spero: Pursuant to your clerk’s instruction, please allow this to serve as a joint request by all parties to allow Diane P. Cragg, Esq. to attend the discovery hearing in the abovereferenced matter in place of the undersigned who is lead trial attorney. Unfortunately, I am not available for the 9:30 a.m. hearing on March 1, 2013 (or any of the alternative dates provided). However, Ms. Cragg is the attorney who handled the discovery that is in dispute, as well as the subsequent meet and confer efforts. Ms. Cragg will be fully informed to discuss the matter and will abide and consent to all of the Court’s decisions as a result of the hearing. Opposing counsel has graciously waived attendance of the undersigned as lead trial counsel for the purposes of the March 1, 2013 hearing. Thus, we respectfully and jointly request the Court’s permission to allow Diane P. Cragg, Esq. to represent defendants at the discovery hearing. RT HCQ:ed cc: A H ER Spero seph C. FO NO Judge Jo R NIA ERED O ORD IT IS S LI UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O Dated: 2/27/13 S Thank you. N F D IS T IC T O R Jonathan B. Gaskin C Very truly yours, MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP /s/ Heidi C. Quan Heidi C. Quan Magistrate Justice Joseph C. Spero February 26, 2013 Page 2 Kaufhold Gaskin, LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?