Morrison et al v. T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. et al

Filing 68

ORDER DENYING (63) T. ROWE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/18/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2013) Modified on 9/18/2013 (bpf, COURT STAFF).

1 Valarie H. Jonas (SBN 137525)
[e-mail]
2 Alicia M. Gurries (SBN 210225)
[e-mail]
3 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 550
4 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendants, T. ROWE PRICE
GROUP, INC; T. ROWE PRICE
7 INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.; T.
ROWE PRICE SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE
8 PRICE TRUST COMPANY
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13 ASHLEY MORRISON,
Plaintiff,

14
15

vs.

16 T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC.; T.
ROWE PRICE INVESTMENT
17 SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE
SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE
18 TRUST COMPANY; and DOES 110,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

CASE NO. C11-2813 EMC

Denying

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC.; T.
ROWE PRICE INVESTMENT
SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE
SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE
TRUST COMPANY
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
CONTINUE MEDIATION
DEADLINE

The Court has considered Defendants T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC.;
T. ROWE PRICE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE
SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE TRUST COMPANY Administrative Motion
to Continue the Mediation Deadline [Civil L.R. 7-11], and has considered
Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion, and good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

28
3:11-cv-02813-EMC
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DATE;[PROPOSED] ORDER

1

1.

T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE INVESTMENT

2 SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE SERVICES, INC.; T. ROWE PRICE
DENIED.

3 TRUST COMPANY'S Motion is GRANTED.
2.

4

The mediation deadline will be continued to January 31, 2014 or

5 such other date and time as the Court shall order, to allow the parties to complete

15

R NIA

dwar
Judge E

ER

H

14

RT

13

en

d M. Ch

NO

12

LI

11

UNIT
ED

10

RT
U
O

9

S DISTRICT
____________________________
TE
C
TA
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Judge of the District Court
D
DENIE

S

September 18
8 Dated: _____________, 2013

A

7

will remain November 6, 2013.
3. Any discovery dispute must be brought to Judge Spero on an
expedited basis.

FO

6 mediation.

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3:11-cv-02813-EMC
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADM. MOTION TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1