Morrison et al v. T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. et al
Filing
73
Discovery Order re: Dkt. No. 69 . Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 22, 2013. (jcslc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2013)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
ASHLEY MORRISON,
Case No. 11-cv-02813-EMC (JCS)
Plaintiff.
7
v.
DISCOVERY ORDER
8
9
T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC., et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 69
Defendants.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing held on October 22, 2013, the Court
13
orders as follows: (1) within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff shall produce the entire litigation
14
file of the litigation referred to in the joint letter dated October 2, 2013 (“Estate Litigation”),
15
except for information and documents protected by the attorney client privilege or the attorney
16
work product doctrine; and (2) within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff shall produce: (a) redacted
17
bills for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with the Estate Litigation and a privilege
18
log that complies with Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 26, or (b) unredacted bills for attorneys’
19
fees incurred in connection with the Estate Litigation. If Plaintiff chooses to produce the
20
unredacted bills, that production shall not constitute a waiver of the attorney client privilege or the
21
attorney work product doctrine in this action or in any other federal or state proceeding pursuant to
22
Federal Rule of Evidence, Rule 502(d).
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 22, 2013
______________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?