Morrison et al v. T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. et al

Filing 73

Discovery Order re: Dkt. No. 69 . Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on October 22, 2013. (jcslc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ASHLEY MORRISON, Case No. 11-cv-02813-EMC (JCS) Plaintiff. 7 v. DISCOVERY ORDER 8 9 T. ROWE PRICE GROUP, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 69 Defendants. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing held on October 22, 2013, the Court 13 orders as follows: (1) within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff shall produce the entire litigation 14 file of the litigation referred to in the joint letter dated October 2, 2013 (“Estate Litigation”), 15 except for information and documents protected by the attorney client privilege or the attorney 16 work product doctrine; and (2) within thirty days of this Order, Plaintiff shall produce: (a) redacted 17 bills for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with the Estate Litigation and a privilege 18 log that complies with Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 26, or (b) unredacted bills for attorneys’ 19 fees incurred in connection with the Estate Litigation. If Plaintiff chooses to produce the 20 unredacted bills, that production shall not constitute a waiver of the attorney client privilege or the 21 attorney work product doctrine in this action or in any other federal or state proceeding pursuant to 22 Federal Rule of Evidence, Rule 502(d). 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 22, 2013 ______________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?