Parker v. Astrue

Filing 12

ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/17/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 TINA MARIE PARKER, 13 Plaintiff, 14 Case No.: 11-2891 JSC ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE v. 15 16 17 MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiff Tina Marie Parker, through counsel, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 20 21 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision by Defendant Michael J. Astrue, the 22 Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying her disability benefits. 23 Defendant filed an answer to the Complaint on October 19, 2011. (Dkt. No. 8). Plaintiff 24 failed to file her motion for summary judgment within 28 days as required by Local Rule 16- 25 5. 26 On December 9, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action 27 should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28 41(b). (Dkt. No. 11). The Court also granted Plaintiff an extension of time, up through 1 December 23, 2011, to file her motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was warned that 2 failure to comply with the Court’s order might result in the dismissal of this action. 3 To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s December 9, 2011 order nor has 4 Plaintiff filed her motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, this action is dismissed for 5 failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 6 The Clerk shall close this file. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: January 17, 2012 _________________________________ JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 Northern District of California United States District Court 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?