Parker v. Astrue
Filing
12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/17/2012. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
TINA MARIE PARKER,
13
Plaintiff,
14
Case No.: 11-2891 JSC
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
v.
15
16
17
MICHAEL ASTRUE, Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff Tina Marie Parker, through counsel, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §
20
21
405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision by Defendant Michael J. Astrue, the
22
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying her disability benefits.
23
Defendant filed an answer to the Complaint on October 19, 2011. (Dkt. No. 8). Plaintiff
24
failed to file her motion for summary judgment within 28 days as required by Local Rule 16-
25
5.
26
On December 9, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action
27
should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
28
41(b). (Dkt. No. 11). The Court also granted Plaintiff an extension of time, up through
1
December 23, 2011, to file her motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was warned that
2
failure to comply with the Court’s order might result in the dismissal of this action.
3
To date, Plaintiff has not responded to the Court’s December 9, 2011 order nor has
4
Plaintiff filed her motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, this action is dismissed for
5
failure to prosecute pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
6
The Clerk shall close this file.
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: January 17, 2012
_________________________________
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
Northern District of California
United States District Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?