Tamburri v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 61

ORDER Shortening Time on Wells Fargo's Motion to Set Aside Default Moiton to be filed by 10/14/11, hearing set 10/28/11 at 1:30 p.m. opposition due 10/21/11, reply due 10/25/11. Signed by Judge Edward Chen on 10/17/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEBORAH TAMBURRI, ) Case No. 3: 11-CV-02899-EMC ) Honorable Edward M. Chen 1 Plaintiff, \ j vs. ) SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, MC.; WELLS ) FARGO BANK, N.A.; U.S. BANK ) NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; MORTGAGE ) ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS; ) ) and RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., Defendants, ) [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT First Amended Complaint Filed: June 10, 2011 1 1 Defendants. ) The stipulation of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and plaintiff Deborah Tambuni for a order shortening time for hearing on the motion to set aside default (the "Motion") came before this Court. Having considered the stipulation, and noting sufficient notice given to plaintiff, goo cause appearing, the stipulation is granted, as follows: 1. t The Motion shall be filed and served no later than October 14,2011, and will be s for hearing in the Court at 1 :30 p.m. on October 28, 201 1 in Department 5 of the above-entitled Court. 2. Any opposition to the Motion must be filed and served on or before October 2 1, 201 1. 1 W \ i i z u I )I W 2 7 4 . o : L t s p s W IU ) 4 1 I D a CASE NO. 3: 1 1-CV-02899-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE Case3:lI -cv-02899-EMC Document56-2 3. Filed 1011411 1 Page2 of 3 Any reply to any such opposition must be d on or before October 2 201 1. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Dated: ( 17 ,201 1 HON. EDWARD M. CHEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2 CASE NO. 3: 1 1-CV-02899-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER SHORTENING TIME ON WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?