Tamburri v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al
Filing
81
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 80 Notice (Other) filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association Case Management Statement due by 1/27/2012. Case Management Conference set for 2/3/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/13/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
DONALD M. SCOTTEN (SBN 190532)
Email: donald.scotten@akerman.com
BRYAN M. LEIFER (SBN 265837)
Email: bryan.leifer@akerman.com
725 South Figueroa Street, 38th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-5433
Telephone: (213) 688-9500
Facsimile: (213) 627-6342
Attorneys for Defendants
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.;
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, for
STARM 2007-2 (Erroneously named herein as “U.S. Bank National Association”), and
WELLS FARGO BANK. N.A.
725 S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 3800
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
TEL.: (213) 688-9500 – FAX: (213) 627-6342
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
DEBORAH TAMBURRI,
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC
Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ; ORDER
v.
16
17
18
19
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.; U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; and DOES 120;
20
Defendants.
21
Hearing Date:
Date: December 16, 2011
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor
Proposed Hearing Date:
Date: February 3, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor
Complaint Filed: April 13, 2011
First Amended Complaint Filed: June 10, 2011
Trial Date: None
22
23
24
25
26
27
The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the hearing date for the Case Management
Conference should be continued to February 3, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.
A joint CMC Statement shall be filed by January 27, 2011.
28
{22763794;1}
1
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Dated: December 12, 2011
2
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
By: /s/ Bryan M. Leifer
Bryan M. Leifer
Attorneys for Defendants
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.;
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS
TRUSTEE, FOR STARM 2007-2; WELLS FARGO
BANK, N.A.
3
4
5
6
7
8
Dated: December 12, 2011
9
By: /s/ Nelson Goodell
Nelson Goodell
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
DEBORAH TAMBURRI
10
725 S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 3800
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
TEL.: (213) 688-9500 – FAX: (213) 627-6342
11
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
THE GOODELL LAW FIRM
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{22763794;1}
2
CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
DEBORAH TAMBURRI,
13
Case No. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC
Plaintiff,
Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen
14
15
16
17
18
19
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.; WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.; U.S. BANK NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; and DOES
1-20;
Defendants.
20
Hearing Date:
Date: December 16, 2011
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor
Proposed Hearing Date:
Date: February 3, 2012
Time: 10:00 a.m. 9:00 A.M.
Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor
21
22
By:
JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN
28
{22763794;1}
O ORD
IT IS S
ERED
R NIA
27
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT ___________
T
RT
U
O
12/13/11
Dated: ___________________
NO
3
CASE NO.M. Chen
3:11-CV-02899-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDERge Edward
Jud
RT
FO
26
January 27, 2012.
H
ER
LI
25
A
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference be continued from
9:00 a.m.
December 12, 2011 to February 3, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement is due on
S
23
UNIT
ED
725 S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 3800
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
TEL.: (213) 688-9500 – FAX: (213) 627-6342
AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?