Tamburri v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. et al

Filing 81

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 80 Notice (Other) filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association Case Management Statement due by 1/27/2012. Case Management Conference set for 2/3/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/13/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP DONALD M. SCOTTEN (SBN 190532) Email: donald.scotten@akerman.com BRYAN M. LEIFER (SBN 265837) Email: bryan.leifer@akerman.com 725 South Figueroa Street, 38th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-5433 Telephone: (213) 688-9500 Facsimile: (213) 627-6342 Attorneys for Defendants SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, for STARM 2007-2 (Erroneously named herein as “U.S. Bank National Association”), and WELLS FARGO BANK. N.A. 725 S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 3800 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 TEL.: (213) 688-9500 – FAX: (213) 627-6342 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 DEBORAH TAMBURRI, Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ; ORDER v. 16 17 18 19 SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; and DOES 120; 20 Defendants. 21 Hearing Date: Date: December 16, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor Proposed Hearing Date: Date: February 3, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor Complaint Filed: April 13, 2011 First Amended Complaint Filed: June 10, 2011 Trial Date: None 22 23 24 25 26 27 The parties hereby stipulate and agree that the hearing date for the Case Management Conference should be continued to February 3, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. A joint CMC Statement shall be filed by January 27, 2011. 28 {22763794;1} 1 CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dated: December 12, 2011 2 AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP By: /s/ Bryan M. Leifer Bryan M. Leifer Attorneys for Defendants SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, FOR STARM 2007-2; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: December 12, 2011 9 By: /s/ Nelson Goodell Nelson Goodell Attorneys for Plaintiff, DEBORAH TAMBURRI 10 725 S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 3800 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 TEL.: (213) 688-9500 – FAX: (213) 627-6342 11 AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP THE GOODELL LAW FIRM 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {22763794;1} 2 CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 DEBORAH TAMBURRI, 13 Case No. 3:11-CV-02899-EMC Plaintiff, Hon. Judge Edward M. Chen 14 15 16 17 18 19 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; and DOES 1-20; Defendants. 20 Hearing Date: Date: December 16, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor Proposed Hearing Date: Date: February 3, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. 9:00 A.M. Crtrm.: 5, 17th Floor 21 22 By: JUDGE EDWARD M. CHEN 28 {22763794;1} O ORD IT IS S ERED R NIA 27 ISTRIC ES D TC AT ___________ T RT U O 12/13/11 Dated: ___________________ NO 3 CASE NO.M. Chen 3:11-CV-02899-EMC JOINT STIPULATION & [PROPOSED] ORDERge Edward Jud RT FO 26 January 27, 2012. H ER LI 25 A 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference be continued from 9:00 a.m. December 12, 2011 to February 3, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement is due on S 23 UNIT ED 725 S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 3800 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 TEL.: (213) 688-9500 – FAX: (213) 627-6342 AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP 11 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?