Ridout v. Ellis et al
Filing
6
ORDER of Dismissal. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/17/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service). (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
TERRY LEE RIDOUT,
9
Plaintiff,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
G. ELLIS, C.E.O., et al.,
12
No. C-11-2936 EMC (pr)
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
15
This action was opened in error when the Court received from Plaintiff on different days the
16
materials he had sent to commence a single action. He mailed a document entitled “adjacently-filed
17
addendum in support of statement of claim” on June 7, 2011, which was filed on June 13, 2011, and
18
resulted in Case No. C 11-2883 EMC being opened. He mailed a civil rights complaint in a separate
19
envelope on June 8, 2011, which was filed on June 15, 2011, and resulted in this action (i.e., Case
20
No. C-11-2936 EMC) being opened. Plaintiff later informed the Court that he only intended to file a
21
single action. He requested that one of the actions be dismissed and that he not be charged a filing
22
fee for it. Accordingly, this action is dismissed because it was opened in error. No filing fee is due.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
The Clerk shall obtain a copy of the complaint from this action (i.e., Docket # 1 in Case No.
2
C-11-2936 EMC), cross out the case number on the first page, and file it in Case No. C-11-2883
3
EMC. The Clerk shall then close the file for Case No. C-11-2936 EMC.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: October 17, 2011
8
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?