California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. M & M Services, Inc.
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC to respond to the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 05/04/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
ROGERS JOSEPH O’DONNELL
Robert C. Goodman (State Bar No. 111554)
rgoodman@rjo.com
D. Kevin Shipp (State Bar No. 245947)
kshipp@rjo.com
311 California Street
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415.956.2828
Facsimile: 415.956.6457
Attorneys for Defendant
SHILOH ROAD, LLC
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE, et al.,
13
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
15
M & M SERVICES, INC., et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
Case No. C 11-02949 TEH
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT
SHILOH ROAD, LLC IS TO RESPOND
TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
First Amended Complaint Filed: December
6, 2011
Honorable Thelton E. Henderson
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), by Plaintiffs and
Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, as follows:
WHEREAS at the April 26, 2012 mediation session with Steven Weissman the
parties reached a tentative agreement to settle the action.
WHEREAS the parties are in the process of addressing one remaining technical
issue and drafting a formal settlement agreement.
WHEREAS, upon its finalization and execution, the agreement between
26
Plaintiffs and Defendant M & M Services, Inc. will be submitted to the United States
27
Environmental Protection Agency and United States Department of Justice for consideration
28
by those agencies during a forty-five (45) day review period.
Page 1
Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC is to Respond to First Amended Complaint
CASE NO: C 11-02949 TEH
316991.4
WHEREAS Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC’s response to the First Amended
1
2
Complaint is currently due May 14, 2012, and the parties wish to avoid the expense of
3
responding to the First Amended Complaint in light of the likely settlement.
4
WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Shiloh Road, LLC have agreed that Shiloh Road,
5
LLC may have an additional ninety (90) days to respond to the First Amended Complaint.
WHEREAS the stipulation to extend the time within which Shiloh, LLC is to
6
7
answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint will not alter the date of any
8
event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Shiloh Road, LLC, by and through their
9
10
undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that, the time within which Shiloh Road,
11
LLC is to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is extended to
12
and including August 14, 2012.
13
Dated: May 3, 2012
LOZEAU DRURY LLP
14
By:
15
16
17
18
/s/ Michael R. Lozeau
MICHAEL R. LOZEAU
Attorneys for Plaintiffs California
Sportfishing Protection Alliance and
Petaluma River Council
.
ROGERS JOSEPH O'DONNELL
Dated: May 3, 2012
19
By:
20
21
/s/ Robert C. Goodman
ROBERT C. GOODMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
SHILOH ROAD, LLC
22
23
Lozeau for Plaintiffs.
S
NO
n
enderso
lton E. H
RT
he
Judge T
R NIA
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
FO
28
UNIT
ED
27
05/04/2012
RT
U
O
26
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
By:
/s/ Robert C. Goodman
ROBERT C. GOODMAN
Attorneys for Defendant
SHILOH ROAD, LLC
Page 2
LI
25
I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Michael
H
Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC is to Respond to First Amended Complaint
E
CASE NO: R N
C 11-02949 TEH F C
A
24
D IS T IC T O
R
316991.4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?