California Sportfishing Protection Alliance et al v. M & M Services, Inc.

Filing 29

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC to respond to the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 05/04/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ROGERS JOSEPH O’DONNELL Robert C. Goodman (State Bar No. 111554) rgoodman@rjo.com D. Kevin Shipp (State Bar No. 245947) kshipp@rjo.com 311 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: 415.956.2828 Facsimile: 415.956.6457 Attorneys for Defendant SHILOH ROAD, LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, et al., 13 14 Plaintiffs, vs. 15 M & M SERVICES, INC., et al., 16 Defendants. 17 Case No. C 11-02949 TEH STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT SHILOH ROAD, LLC IS TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint Filed: December 6, 2011 Honorable Thelton E. Henderson 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), by Plaintiffs and Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, as follows: WHEREAS at the April 26, 2012 mediation session with Steven Weissman the parties reached a tentative agreement to settle the action. WHEREAS the parties are in the process of addressing one remaining technical issue and drafting a formal settlement agreement. WHEREAS, upon its finalization and execution, the agreement between 26 Plaintiffs and Defendant M & M Services, Inc. will be submitted to the United States 27 Environmental Protection Agency and United States Department of Justice for consideration 28 by those agencies during a forty-five (45) day review period. Page 1 Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC is to Respond to First Amended Complaint CASE NO: C 11-02949 TEH 316991.4 WHEREAS Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC’s response to the First Amended 1 2 Complaint is currently due May 14, 2012, and the parties wish to avoid the expense of 3 responding to the First Amended Complaint in light of the likely settlement. 4 WHEREAS Plaintiffs and Shiloh Road, LLC have agreed that Shiloh Road, 5 LLC may have an additional ninety (90) days to respond to the First Amended Complaint. WHEREAS the stipulation to extend the time within which Shiloh, LLC is to 6 7 answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint will not alter the date of any 8 event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. NOW THEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Shiloh Road, LLC, by and through their 9 10 undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that, the time within which Shiloh Road, 11 LLC is to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint is extended to 12 and including August 14, 2012. 13 Dated: May 3, 2012 LOZEAU DRURY LLP 14 By: 15 16 17 18 /s/ Michael R. Lozeau MICHAEL R. LOZEAU Attorneys for Plaintiffs California Sportfishing Protection Alliance and Petaluma River Council . ROGERS JOSEPH O'DONNELL Dated: May 3, 2012 19 By: 20 21 /s/ Robert C. Goodman ROBERT C. GOODMAN Attorneys for Defendant SHILOH ROAD, LLC 22 23 Lozeau for Plaintiffs. S NO n enderso lton E. H RT he Judge T R NIA ERED O ORD IT IS S FO 28 UNIT ED 27 05/04/2012 RT U O 26 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T By: /s/ Robert C. Goodman ROBERT C. GOODMAN Attorneys for Defendant SHILOH ROAD, LLC Page 2 LI 25 I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Michael H Stipulation to Extend Time Within Which Defendant Shiloh Road, LLC is to Respond to First Amended Complaint E CASE NO: R N C 11-02949 TEH F C A 24 D IS T IC T O R 316991.4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?