Maxim Realty and Loans, Inc. v. de Castro
Filing
11
ORDER by Judge Samuel Conti adopting 8 Report and Recommendations. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2011)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
MAXIM REALTY AND LOANS, INC.,
7
8
Plaintiff,
v.
9
GRACE DE CASTRO,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Defendant.
11
12
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C 11-02960 SC
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
REMANDING CASE
14
15
Plaintiff Maxim Realty and Loans, Inc. ("Plaintiff") brought
16
this action for unlawful detainer in the Superior Court of the
17
State of California, County of Alameda.
18
Removal") Ex. A ("Compl.").
19
("Defendant") later removed the action to federal court.
20
Removal.
21
Recommendation in which she recommends this Court remand this
22
action to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of
23
Alameda.
24
ECF No. 1 ("Not. Of
Defendant Grace De Castro
Not. of
Magistrate Judge James has issued a Report and
ECF No. 8 ("Report & Recommendation").
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds
25
it correct, thorough, and well-reasoned, and adopts it in every
26
respect.
27
Complaint asserts only one state law claim for unlawful detainer.
28
Diversity jurisdiction is not a proper basis for removal since
Federal question jurisdiction does not lie because the
1
Plaintiff is incorporated in California and Defendant is a citizen
2
and resident of California.
3
Defendant failed to respond to Magistrate Judge James' Order to
4
Show Cause why the case should not be remanded.
5
to Show Cause").
6
7
Not. of Removal ΒΆ 16.
Additionally,
ECF No. 7 ("Order
Accordingly, the Court REMANDS this action to the Superior
Court of the State of California, County of Alameda.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
Dated:
October 28, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?