Edwards v. Comair, Inc. et al

Filing 40

ORDER FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The August 20, 2012 trial date, the August 7, 2012 pre-trial conference date, and all related dates are vacated. Further, the parties are ordered to file a joint status report no later than August 24, 2012, unless a dismissal has been filed prior to that date. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 13, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Richard G. Grotch, Esq. – SBN 127713 Gina J. Beltramo, Esq. – SBN 203809 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, California 94065-2133 Telephone: (650) 592-5400 Facsimile: (650) 592-5027 E-mail: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant COMAIR, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELANIE EDWARDS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOLLOWING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT vs. 14 Case No. CV 11-2963 MMC (BZ) COMAIR, INC., 15 Defendant. Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS the parties to this action participated in a settlement conference on July 11, 2012, conducted by Honorable Bernard Zimmerman; and WHEREAS the parties reached a settlement as to all parties and all claims, with the terms of the settlement placed on the record (ECF Dkt. 38); and WHEREAS Magistrate Judge Zimmerman set August 10, 2012 as the deadline for the parties to exchange settlement documents and for the settlement funds to be disbursed; and WHEREAS this case is scheduled for a jury trial to commence on August 20, 2012, with a 26 27 pre-trial conference to be conducted on August 7, 2012; and 28 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corp., Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300 Redwood City, CA 94065 (650) 592-5400 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No: CV 11-2963 MMC 1 WHEREAS one of the inducements for the parties to reach a settlement was to avoid the 2 expense associated with trial, the pre-trial conference and preparation of the documents required 3 for the pre-trial conference; 4 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective 5 6 counsel of record, that the Court be asked to issue an order vacating all remaining trial and pre- 7 trial dates pending completion of the settlement and the filing of a stipulation and proposed 8 order of dismissal with prejudice. 9 SO STIPULATED. 10 11 Dated: July 12, 2012 STERNS & WALKER 12 /s/ Gerald C. Sterns By: _____________________________ Gerald C. Sterns Attorney for Plaintiff Melanie Edwards 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: July 12, 2012 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH 18 /s/ Richard G. Grotch By: _____________________________ Richard G. Grotch (*) Attorney for Defendant Comair, Inc. 19 20 21 22 (*) 23 I hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corp., Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300 Redwood City, CA 94065 (650) 592-5400 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No: CV 11-2963 MMC 1 2 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER Upon the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: That the August 20, 2012 trial date, the August 7, 2012 pre-trial conference date, and all 4 5 6 related dates be VACATED. Further, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint status report no later than August 24, 2012, unless a dismissal has been filed prior to that date. SO ORDERED. 7 8 Date: July 13, 2012 ___________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney Senior United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corp., Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300 Redwood City, CA 94065 (650) 592-5400 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Case No: CV 11-2963 MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?