Edwards v. Comair, Inc. et al
Filing
43
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The claims of plaintiff Melanie Edwards are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 30, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Richard G. Grotch, Esq. – SBN 127713
Gina J. Beltramo, Esq. – SBN 203809
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH
A Professional Corporation, Lawyers
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300
Redwood City, California 94065-2133
Telephone: (650) 592-5400
Facsimile: (650) 592-5027
E-mail: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com
ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant
COMAIR, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MELANIE EDWARDS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
Case No. CV 11-2963 MMC (BZ)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE
COMAIR, INC.,
15
Defendant.
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
16
17
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff MELANIE EDWARDS and
defendant COMAIR, INC., through their respective counsel of record, that all the claims of
plaintiff be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal
20
21
22
23
Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear her or its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: 29 August 2012
STERNS & WALKER
24
/s/ Gerald C. Sterns
By: _____________________________
Gerald C. Sterns
Attorney for Plaintiff
Melanie Edwards
25
26
27
28
CODDINGTON, HICKS
& DANFORTH
A Professional Corp., Lawyers
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300
Redwood City, CA 94065
(650) 592-5400
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL
Case No: CV 11-2963 MMC
1
1
Dated: August 29, 2012
CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH
2
/s/ Richard G. Grotch
By: _____________________________
Richard G. Grotch (*)
Attorney for Defendant
Comair, Inc.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
(*)
I hereby attest that I have on file all
Holographic signatures indicated by a
“conformed” signature (/s/)
within this e-filed document.
10
[PROPOSED] ORDER
11
12
Upon consideration of the foregoing Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby
13
ordered that the claims of plaintiff MELANIE EDWARDS be, and hereby are, dismissed with
14
prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear her
15
16
or its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit.
August 30
Dated: ______________, 2012
17
18
__________________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States Senior District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CODDINGTON, HICKS
& DANFORTH
A Professional Corp., Lawyers
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300
Redwood City, CA 94065
(650) 592-5400
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL
Case No: CV 11-2963 MMC
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?