Edwards v. Comair, Inc. et al

Filing 43

ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The claims of plaintiff Melanie Edwards are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 30, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Richard G. Grotch, Esq. – SBN 127713 Gina J. Beltramo, Esq. – SBN 203809 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, California 94065-2133 Telephone: (650) 592-5400 Facsimile: (650) 592-5027 E-mail: rgrotch@chdlawyers.com ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant COMAIR, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELANIE EDWARDS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 Case No. CV 11-2963 MMC (BZ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE COMAIR, INC., 15 Defendant. Honorable Maxine M. Chesney 16 17 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff MELANIE EDWARDS and defendant COMAIR, INC., through their respective counsel of record, that all the claims of plaintiff be, and hereby are, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal 20 21 22 23 Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear her or its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit. SO STIPULATED. Dated: 29 August 2012 STERNS & WALKER 24 /s/ Gerald C. Sterns By: _____________________________ Gerald C. Sterns Attorney for Plaintiff Melanie Edwards 25 26 27 28 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corp., Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300 Redwood City, CA 94065 (650) 592-5400 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL Case No: CV 11-2963 MMC 1 1 Dated: August 29, 2012 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH 2 /s/ Richard G. Grotch By: _____________________________ Richard G. Grotch (*) Attorney for Defendant Comair, Inc. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (*) I hereby attest that I have on file all Holographic signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER 11 12 Upon consideration of the foregoing Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, it is hereby 13 ordered that the claims of plaintiff MELANIE EDWARDS be, and hereby are, dismissed with 14 prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party to bear her 15 16 or its own attorneys’ fees and costs of suit. August 30 Dated: ______________, 2012 17 18 __________________________________ Honorable Maxine M. Chesney United States Senior District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corp., Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, #300 Redwood City, CA 94065 (650) 592-5400 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL Case No: CV 11-2963 MMC 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?