United States Of America v. Gray

Filing 6

ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/2/2011. Case Management Conference set for 9/9/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 8/2/11. (Attachments: # 1 Cert Serve)(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2011)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

7
8
9

Plaintiff(s),
ORDER SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

v.
RICHARD N GRAY,
Defendant(s).
____________________________________/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

No. C 11-02988 JCS

12

TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:

13

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer regarding the possibility

14

of settling this matter not later than August 22, 2011. If the matter is settled, the parties shall notify

15

the Court immediately.

16

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Case Management Conference is scheduled for

17

September 9, 2011, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate

18

Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102.

19
20
21
22

The parties shall appear in person or through counsel and shall be prepared to discuss
scheduling of future proceedings in this case.
A joint case management statement shall be filed by September 2, 2011, in accordance with
Civil Local Rule 16-9. The case management statement shall address the following issues:

23

A.

24

Include a brief statement of the principal facts and events underlying the action.

25

Identify the principal factual and legal issues that the parties dispute.

26

B.

27

Identify the alternative dispute resolution procedure(s) which the parties intend to use, or

28

Principal Issues

Alternative Dispute Resolution and Settlement

report specifically why no such procedure would assist in the resolution of the case.

1

Suggest ways the Court might help with the settlement process.

2

C.

3

Whether the parties will consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge for all purposes.

4

D.

5

Identify any motions whose early resolution would likely have a significant effect on the

6
7

E.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

Discovery
1.

Describe the discovery each party intends to take and how long discovery is

expected to take. No discovery shall be taken until after the conference.

10
11

Motions

scope of discovery or other aspects of the case.

8
9

Consent

2.

Recommend limitations on discovery and, if appropriate, on subject areas,

types of witnesses, and/or time periods to which discovery should be confined.

12

F.

13

State the month and year in which the parties recommend the trial should commence, the

14
15

Trial

anticipated length of trial and whether the trial will be before the court or a jury.
G.

Additional Scheduling

16

1.

Recommend time limits to conclude discovery and to hear motions.

17

2.

Recommend the date for the pretrial conference and for filing the papers

18
19

required for the pretrial conference.
At the time of filing the original with the Clerk’s Office, two conformed copies of all

20

documents shall be delivered directly to chambers on the 15th floor. All documents shall list the

21

civil case number followed by the designation “JCS.”

22
23
24
25

Dated: August 2, 2011
__________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge

26
27
28

2