Cottrell v. Stumpf et al

Filing 16

ORDER re: dismissal (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO 10 JOHN H. COTTRELL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 v. JOHN G. STUMPF; JOHN D. BAKER II; JOHN S. CHEN; LLOYD H. DEAN; SUSAN E. ENGEL; ENRIQUE HERNANDEZ, JR.; DONALD M. JAMES; RICHARD D. MCCORMICK; MACKEY J. MCDONALD; CYNTHIA H. MULLIGAN; NICHOLAS G. MOORE; PHILIP J. QUIGLEY; JUDITH M. RUNSTAD; STEVEN W. WANGER; SUSAN G. SWENSON; and RICHARD M. KOVACEVICH; CASE NO.: 11-CV-3006-SI [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF COTTRELL ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Hearing Date: N/A Time: N/A Courtroom: Hon. Susan Illston Complaint Filed: June 17, 2011 Defendants, 20 and 21 WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 22 23 Nominal Defendant. _____________________________________ 24 Based on Plaintiffs’ Request for Voluntary Dismissal, and good cause appearing therefor, 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Cottrell Action only is dismissed without prejudice 26 and without the need to provide notice of such dismissal. 27 Dated: August ___, 2011 11 28 HON. SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Court Judge ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL CASE NO.: 11-CV-3006-SI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?