Cottrell v. Stumpf et al
Filing
16
ORDER re: dismissal (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO
10
JOHN H. COTTRELL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
v.
JOHN G. STUMPF; JOHN D. BAKER II;
JOHN S. CHEN; LLOYD H. DEAN;
SUSAN E. ENGEL; ENRIQUE
HERNANDEZ, JR.; DONALD M. JAMES;
RICHARD D. MCCORMICK; MACKEY J.
MCDONALD; CYNTHIA H. MULLIGAN;
NICHOLAS G. MOORE; PHILIP J.
QUIGLEY; JUDITH M. RUNSTAD;
STEVEN W. WANGER; SUSAN G.
SWENSON; and RICHARD M.
KOVACEVICH;
CASE NO.: 11-CV-3006-SI
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL OF COTTRELL ACTION
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P.
41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
Hearing Date: N/A
Time:
N/A
Courtroom:
Hon. Susan Illston
Complaint Filed: June 17, 2011
Defendants,
20
and
21
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation,
22
23
Nominal Defendant.
_____________________________________
24
Based on Plaintiffs’ Request for Voluntary Dismissal, and good cause appearing therefor,
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Cottrell Action only is dismissed without prejudice
26
and without the need to provide notice of such dismissal.
27
Dated: August ___, 2011
11
28
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Court Judge
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
CASE NO.: 11-CV-3006-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?