Freeman v. ABC Legal Services, Inc. et al
Filing
94
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 93 to Dismiss Case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) filed by ABC Legal Services, Inc., Ruby Nell Freeman, Granville Ewing Smith, III. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/10/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
Fred W. Schwinn (SBN 225575)
CONSUMER LAW CENTER, INC.
12 South First Street, Suite 1014
San Jose, California 95113-2418
Telephone Number: (408) 294-6100
Facsimile Number: (408) 294-6190
Email Address: fred.schwinn@sjconsumerlaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
RUBY NELL FREEMAN
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
11
RUBY NELL FREEMAN,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 3:11-CV-03007-EMC
v.
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., a Washington
corporation, and GRANVILLE EWING
SMITH, III, individually and in his official
capacity,
16
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)
Defendants.
17
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), Plaintiff, RUBY NELL FREEMAN, and Defendant, ABC
18
19
LEGAL SERVICES, INC., stipulate, and the Court hereby orders, as follows:
20
21
22
1.
The dispute between the parties has been settled, therefore, the claims asserted by
Plaintiff, RUBY NELL FREEMAN, against Defendants, ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC., and
GRANVILLE EWING SMITH, III, in the above-captioned proceeding are hereby dismissed, with
23
24
prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1).
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
-1STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:11-CV-03007-EMC
1
Dated: December 20, 2012
/s/ Fred W. Schwinn
Fred W. Schwinn, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff
RUBY NELL FREEMAN
Dated: December 20, 2012
/s/ William S. Weisberg
William S. Weisberg, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
ABC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
Dated: December 20, 2012
/s/ David I. Dalby
David I. Dalby, Esq.
Attorney for Defendant
GRANVILLE EWING SMITH, III
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
RT
19
dwar
Judge E
ER
21
A
H
20
en
d M. Ch
NO
18
IT
R NIA
17
The Honorable Edward RED
M. Chen
ORDE
Judge ofIthe District Court
S SO
FO
16
1/10/13
LI
15
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
14
S
13
THE FOREGOING STIPULATION
IS APPROVED AND IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
12
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:11-CV-03007-EMC
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
