McNeary-Calloway v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Case stayed pending the parties' mediation. Parties' shall engage in mediatiion within 60 day of entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/3/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP
Peter Obstler (SBN 171623)
peter.obstler@bingham.com
Zachary J. Alinder (SBN 209009)
zachary.alinder@bingham.com
Three Embarcadero Center
San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
Telephone: 415.393.2000
Facsimile: 415.393.2286
KESSLER TOPAZ
MELTZER & CHECK, LLP
Joseph H. Meltzer
Edward W. Ciolko
Terence S. Ziegler
280 King of Prussia Road
Radnor, PA 19087
Telephone: 610.667.7706
Facsimile: 610.667.7056
Attorneys for Defendants
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
and Chase Bank USA, N.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Patricia McNeary-Calloway, Colin
MacKinnon, Terrie MacKinnon, Andrea
North, and Sheila M. Mayko
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
PATRICIA MCNEARY-CALLOWAY, COLIN
MACKINNON, TERRIE MACKINNON,
ANDREA NORTH, and SHEILA M. MAYKO,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Case No. C 11-03058 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY
CASE PENDING MEDIATION AND
TO SET TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and CHASE
BANK USA, N.A.,
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 11-03058 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
MEDIATION AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
1
Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Bank USA, N.A. (“Chase” or
2
“Defendants”) and Plaintiffs Patricia McNeary-Calloway, Colin MacKinnon, Terrie MacKinnon,
3
Andrea North, and Sheila M. Mayko (“Plaintiffs”) (together with Defendants, the “Parties”)
4
respectfully submit the following Joint Stipulation to Stay the Case Pending Mediation and Set
5
Time to Respond to Complaint.
WHEREAS, the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’
6
7
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on March 26, 2012 (the “March 26,
8
2012 Order”), ECF No. 62;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s March 26, 2012 Order, Plaintiffs had 30 days to file
9
10
an amended complaint, but have decided to stand on their First Amended Complaint, as modified
11
by the March 26, 2012 Order;
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred regarding potential mediation of the
12
13
dispute and an appropriate time for Defendants to respond to the operative Complaint;
WHEREAS, after conferring in good faith, the Parties have agreed, subject to court
14
15
approval, that mediation prior to the further expenditure of additional time and resources of the
16
Parties and the Court would be helpful in attempting to reach an early resolution of the Action;
17
and,
WHEREAS, the Parties accordingly stipulate and agree that the case should be stayed
18
19
pending private mediation, which the Parties agree will begin within 60 days of the date of entry
20
of this Order, and that Defendants’ response date should be extended to 30 days following the
21
termination of the mediation. Either Party or the selected private mediator may declare the
22
mediation terminated by written correspondence of such declaration to the mediator and other
23
Party.
24
25
26
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, AND RESPECTFULLY
REQUESTED, AS FOLLOWS:
The case shall be stayed pending the Parties’ mediation. The Parties shall engage in
27
mediation within 60 days of entry of this Order, or as otherwise set by the Court, in front of a
28
mutually-acceptable mediator. If any Party and/or the selected mediator informs the Court that
1
Case No. C 11-03058 JCS
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
MEDIATION AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
1
the mediation was unsuccessful and terminated, Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs’ First
2
Amended Complaint, as modified by the March 12, 2012 Order, within 30 days after the filing of
3
such a termination notice with the Court.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
DATED: May 2, 2012
6
Respectfully submitted,
Bingham McCutchen LLP
7
By:
8
/s/ Zachary J. Alinder
Peter Obstler
Zachary J. Alinder
Attorneys for Defendants
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
and Chase Bank USA, N.A.
9
10
11
DATED: May 2, 2012
12
13
By:
/s/ Edward W. Ciolko
Edward W. Ciolko
Terence S. Ziegler
Donna Siegel Moffa
Amanda R. Trask
Ramzi Abadou
KESSLER TOPAZ MELTZER &
CHECK, LLP
14
15
16
17
18
Jeffrey J. Angelovich
Michael B. Angelovich
Brad E. Seidel
NIX PATTERSON & ROACH, LLP
19
20
James P. Gitkin
Eric T. Salpeter
SALPETER GITKIN, LLP
21
22
23
Brian D. Penny
GOLDMAN SCARLATO
KARON & PENNY, P.C.
24
25
26
27
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PATRICIA McNEARY-CALLOWAY, COLIN
MACKINNON, TERRIE MACKINNON, ANDREA
NORTH and SHEILA M. MAYKO
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
MEDIATION AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. C 11-03058 JCS
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
ER
H
5/3/12
Dated: _______________
Spero
LI
RT
5
Judge Jo
R NIA
seph C.
NO
4
FO
S
UNIT
ED
3
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
2
A
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Honorable Joseph C. Spero
United States District Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
MEDIATION AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. C 11-03058 JCS
FILER’S ATTESTATION
1
2
Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I, Zachary J. Alinder, attest under penalty of
3
perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from all of the
4
signatories.
5
Dated: May 2, 2012
/s/ Zachary J. Alinder
Zachary J. Alinder
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING
MEDIATION AND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No. C 11-03058 JCS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?