International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers District 9 Pension Plan et al v. Installation of Data and Telecommunications

Filing 48

ORDER OF CONTINGENT DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 3/4/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Richard K. Grosboll, State Bar No. 99729 Benjamin K. Lunch, State Bar No. 246015 NEYHART, ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL 369 Pine Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, CA 94104 Tel. (415) 677-9440 Fax (415) 677-9445 Email: blunch@neyhartlaw.com 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 (San Francisco Division) 9 10 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS DISTRICT 9 PENSION PLAN; et al., 11 Case No. C-11-03063 JCS ORDER OF CONTINGENT DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, Judge: 12 Hon. Joseph C. Spero vs. 13 14 15 INSTALLATION OF DATA AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NEYHART, 28 ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL ATTORNEYS AT LAW -1CONTINGENT DISMISSAL Case No. C-11-3063 JCS 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER: The parties hereto have agreed to a settlement of this action. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 3 that this action is dismissed with prejudice, provided, however, that if any party hereto shall 4 certify to this Court, with proof of service of copy thereon on the opposing party or its counsel that 5 there has been a lack of compliance with the settlement agreement, the foregoing Order shall 6 vacated by this Court and this action shall forthwith be restored to the calendar. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. ER Spero A H 13 R NIA seph C. Judge Jo FO RT 12 ___________________________________ U.S. District Court Judge NO 11 03/04/13 Dated: _______________ LI 10 UNIT ED 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 8 N F D IS T IC T O R C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NEYHART, 28 ANDERSON, FLYNN & GROSBOLL ATTORNEYS AT LAW -2CONTINGENT DISMISSAL Case No. C-11-3063 JCS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?