Cader v. Wells Fargo, NA et al

Filing 38

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 10/7/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 No. C 11-03079 RS EVA CADER, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. WELLS FARGO, NA SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK, F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB; NDEX WEST LLC. AND OTHER AS YET UNAMED DEFENDANTS, Defendants. ____________________________________/ On October 6, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to show cause why defendants should not be 19 held in criminal contempt, and a separate motion for civil contempt and sanctions. However, neither 20 motion was not properly noticed under Local Rule 7-2. Plaintiff is instructed that all future filing 21 must comply with the Local Rules. In addition, plaintiff is informed that she may seek assistance 22 from the Legal Help Center, a free service of the Volunteer Legal Services Program, by calling 23 415/782-9000 x8657, or signing up for an appointment on the 15th floor of the Courthouse, Room 24 2796. At the Legal Help Center, plaintiffs may speak with an attorney who may be able to provide 25 basic legal help but not legal representation. 26 While plaintiff has not complied with the Local Rules, plaintiff’s motion will be deemed 27 suitable for consideration. Defendants are ordered to file an opposition to plaintiff’s motions by 28 NO. C 11-03079 RS ORDER 1 October 21, 2011, not in excess of 10 pages. The papers will be taken under submission without a 2 hearing. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 Dated: 10/7/11 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NO. C 11-03079 RS ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?