Cader v. Wells Fargo, NA et al

Filing 38

ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

*E-Filed 10/7/11*

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

9
No. C 11-03079 RS

EVA CADER,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

Plaintiff,
ORDER

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

v.
WELLS FARGO, NA SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO WELLS FARGO BANK,
F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB;
NDEX WEST LLC. AND OTHER AS YET
UNAMED DEFENDANTS,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
On October 6, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to show cause why defendants should not be

19

held in criminal contempt, and a separate motion for civil contempt and sanctions. However, neither

20

motion was not properly noticed under Local Rule 7-2. Plaintiff is instructed that all future filing

21

must comply with the Local Rules. In addition, plaintiff is informed that she may seek assistance

22

from the Legal Help Center, a free service of the Volunteer Legal Services Program, by calling

23

415/782-9000 x8657, or signing up for an appointment on the 15th floor of the Courthouse, Room

24

2796. At the Legal Help Center, plaintiffs may speak with an attorney who may be able to provide

25

basic legal help but not legal representation.

26

While plaintiff has not complied with the Local Rules, plaintiff’s motion will be deemed

27

suitable for consideration. Defendants are ordered to file an opposition to plaintiff’s motions by

28
NO. C 11-03079 RS
ORDER

1

October 21, 2011, not in excess of 10 pages. The papers will be taken under submission without a

2

hearing.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6

Dated: 10/7/11
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NO. C 11-03079 RS
ORDER

2